This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scray (talk | contribs) at 04:28, 24 February 2011 (→Multiple accounts limited to separate topic sets, cont.: not a big difference). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:28, 24 February 2011 by Scray (talk | contribs) (→Multiple accounts limited to separate topic sets, cont.: not a big difference)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
Fresh start
In the interest of precluding further discussion of matters unrelated to this page, I have archived everything. Anyone who is still interested in the page, please revisit the current version with fresh eyes and suggest improvements, point out areas they think are acceptable, or even great, and just generally focus on how we can improve WP:MEDCOI. For instance, I have a possibly-related article stub/essay I wrote on pharmanoia (User:WLU/Pharmanoia). WAID mentioned it might find a home here. Does anyone else agree? Can anyone see a neat (as in simple and tidy) way of integrating that content or otherwise improving on it? WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 04:05, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Multiple accounts limited to separate topic sets, cont.
Previously proposed was the change "You might be eligible for two separate accounts if you want to separate your work-related editing from non-work-related editing" would convey more detail if replaced with "...if you want to separate your editing in work-related topics from editing in non-work-related topics." Would others like to comment on the proposed language, or propose other language that might be more clear and detailed? BitterGrey (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- The current wording is more compact, yours may be slightly easier to parse except that it's longer. A wash, in my opinion. -- Scray (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2011 (UTC)