This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) at 22:47, 24 February 2022 (Fix misnested tag lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:47, 24 February 2022 by WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) (Fix misnested tag lint errors)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete ridiculous made-up neologism. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Endopanerium
- Delete. neologism without any evidence of widespread use. Prod removed without reason--Porturology 06:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable, unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Is it sad that I've got that whole phrase memorized? -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete invented neologism joshbuddy 06:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete protologism, A proposed name Fan1967 06:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Neologism. -- Samir ∙ C 07:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as neologism. --Terence Ong 11:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. -- Alpha269 15:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 22:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.