Misplaced Pages

Criticism of Prem Rawat

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 64.81.88.140 (talk) at 19:39, 28 June 2004 (Skeptics and opponents). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:39, 28 June 2004 by 64.81.88.140 (talk) (Skeptics and opponents)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

some material of this section has been taken with permission from www.mikefinch.com. Mr Finch is an apostate, and disillusioned ex-follower

Prem Rawat (born 1957) who took the name Maharaji was an Indian guru but now styles himself as an inspirational speaker has a small number of ex-followers and some disgruntled employees of the organizations that support his work, who have become violent critics.

Prem Rawat's elder brother Satpal also claimed ownership of their father's Divine Light Mission which led to a protracted legal challenge in India. Satpal won ownership of all the Indian Divine Light Mission assets whilst an association related to Prem Rawat retained ownership of the assets of Divine Light Mission (renamed Elan Vital) elsewhere. Satpal positions himself in essentially the same manner as his brother, that of being the Satguru (true guru). Currently Maharaji does not call himself Satguru, neither engages in confrontation with his brother.

Ex-followers assert that the meditation techniques that Maharaji teaches have not helped the guru to stop daily drinking of cognac, or having sex with followers, stopped him from cheating on his wife, they did not help the guru overcome his hatred of his mom and two brothers, he shunned his mom seventeen years till she finally died. He still has not let his kids meet their uncles or cousins after over twenty five years and counting. Opponents, including people who have followed the guru for thirty years, like Mike Finch, claim that the techniques can be easily learned without Maharaji, for example on the internet and do not bring anyone to a higher state.

Ex-followers, like Mike Finch, assert that the number of 5.5 million is inaccurate, as the tabulation method counts each audience as if it were all new people. For example, a four-day program with 2,000 people attending would be counted as 8,000 people. Basically, the same people are counted over and over again, as propaganda to bring credibility to the guru. On the other hand, recent events with Prem Rawat in the Indian sub-continent has attracted large crowds.

Finch and some other detractors assert that Maharaji has misled the donors of the "voluntary contributions" by claiming to be lord God almighty in person, and claiming that extremely adamantly for years, though toned down by now. Finch writes that some of his followers are so entrapped, indoctrinated and mind controlled that they give their inheritances and their money to a guy that insists on only having the most expensive excessive lifestyle items. Some ex-followers point out that most, if not all, of his money has come from his followers, through individual donations or businesses. The Prem Rawat Foundation claims that Maharaji supports himself and his family through independent means.

Ex-followers assert that Maharaji is now very wealthy. Apologists claim that his followers support him for giving them such a wonderful gift, and they are only providing him with the comfortable life-style that he deserves. Detractors say that he has milked his followers through manipulation, though opinion differs on whether he is an actual con-artist, deliberately deceiving people, or whether he himself believes that he is indeed the satguru (true guru) of this age and that he is as deluded as his followers.

Finch claims that eyewitnesses among his detractors have published accounts of his regular drinking to excess, keeping a mistress, and smoking cigarettes; and that he had knowledge of one of his senior disciples, Mahatma Jagdeo, actively engaging in pedophilia for years without taking any action. The only action that he took was to send the disciple back to India once the issue heated up. A court case has been settled for one woman who was abused. No formal complaints or police investigations enused from this alleged incident.

There is also an alleged account of his having accidentally run over and killed an Indian man and allowed a young follower to take the blame.

He travels around the world in a Gulfstream V jet airplane (worth $45 million), alleged to be leased for his exclusive use, owns 3 helicopters, and just sold his $7 million yacht. He has mansions in California, England, and India. This expensive method of travel is subsidized by non-profit organizations around the world, as a business expense.

To some of his detractors, Maharaji is the head of a cult, who teaches platitudes and fluff, and lives off the gullibility and credulity of his followers. The late Margaret Singer, Ph.D., one of the most prominent anti-cult activists, included the Divine Light Mission in her list of cults.

Maharaji is not new to controversy, when he was 4 years old and spoke in front of large audiences, detractors cliamed that he did not speak and was only moving his lips while a pre-recorded speach was heard over the PA system.

About Maharaji

See Maharaji 'main article

Debating the allegations

Followers of Maharaji see the vocal critics of him as a small group of ex-followers, not representative of the many followers who have left silently and moved on. They reproach the vocal critics of repeatedly defaming, libelling and harassing Maharaji and his students. Some of these critics have left the practice of Knowledge 20 or more years ago and have not been in touch with this movement since then. The group of vocal critics justifies their campaign as "public service" although many of their activities have leapt, according to official websites, from mere criticism into outright illegal acts.

External Links

Official and un-official websites

Skeptics and opponents

Category: