This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Buckshot06 (talk | contribs) at 20:10, 16 August 2011 (→Merge proposal with Internal Troops (Russia): oppose). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:10, 16 August 2011 by Buckshot06 (talk | contribs) (→Merge proposal with Internal Troops (Russia): oppose)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Military history: Russian & Soviet Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Law Enforcement Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Russia: Military / Politics and law B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
- Discussion copied from User talk:AlexPU:
Legal status: I suspect that the Internal Troops are indeed legally Gendarmies, which means that they are subject to the same treatment as any other internal force. For example, American Police officers oath, is identical to that of soldiers, except for the "juridiction of". So, I "X" do solemnly swear to uphold the Constitution of the United States, agaisnt all enemies, foreign and domestic, in the jurisdiction "Y." In the unlikely case of an invasion, US police/sheriffs would act as the "light infantry. So Internal Troops would be treated as troops, rather than civillians. I am not 100% sure, but pretty sure. Other than that, i don't think they rate any official status as "soldiers," but again, I suspect they have the same status as the local border patrol/ coast guard. That they are civillian in peace, soldiers in war... --V. Joe 05:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- I see... OK, thanks for sharing your thoughts. Let's keep in touch.AlexPU 10:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
AlexPU: Hey again
Reviewing over, I have additional thoughts about the status of the Internal Troops. If you have a gun and fight in an uniform, you are probably soldiers according to the laws of war. Therefore, gendarmes are closer in status to the United States Coast Guard (which assists the Navy during times of war). Most prominently, many of the bosun's at Normandy were Coastguardsmen, and not sailors. Additionally, part of the chain of command during John Kerry's stay in Viet Nam were USCG officers. If they are indeed deeply involved in the Chechen conflict/war/revolution/whatever, it doesn't surprise me that the international media has mislabeled them as "Russian Soldiers/ Russian Army". Especially as very few reporters outside of the US or UK have any expierence in millitary matters, and even in the US media, reporters are often dreadfully confused about the most basic "Army stuff." and occasionally mistake soldiers, airmen and Marines with each other, and even American and British troops at a distance. (They wear different variations of camoflauge and carry slightly different weapons. Also, the Union Jack on the sleeve is a dead giveaway :)). I'm going to do a minor edit for grammar, etc in this new addition. Thanks: V. Joe 05:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Performed minor edits and fixed English useage
V. Joe 05:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
National guard
Changed gendarmerie reference to that of a national guard, which see.--209.213.220.227 (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Merge proposal with Internal Troops (Russia)
I oppose. A resulting article would be too large and inconsistent. 95.132.116.243 (talk) 06:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- I also oppose. This has a nice split between Soviet internal troops and post-Soviet internal troops. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- Start-Class Law enforcement articles
- Unknown-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- B-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance B-Class Russia articles
- B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- B-Class Russia (politics and law) articles
- Politics and law of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles