This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Leef5 (talk | contribs) at 14:49, 10 August 2011 (→Misplaced Pages Policies: response). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:49, 10 August 2011 by Leef5 (talk | contribs) (→Misplaced Pages Policies: response)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Market America article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Companies Unassessed | |||||||||||||||||
|
Reference Instructions
Okay, here's the basic instructions on how to format your references: WP:REFB. DS (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Category
Market America employs a binary compensation plan, which is a type of compensation plan in multi-level marketing. Whilst it is not incorrect to say Market America is a Direct Selling company, for categorization purposes, MLM companies is a subset of Direct selling companies, and thus per WP:SUBCAT, is the correct category for this article. Leef5 18:07, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Policies
The Market America company wikipedia page was recently stamped with breaking policies such as neutral point of view. Is there anyway I can get someone to edit my page so that it doesn't sound like I'm advertising this company? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjchipol (talk • contribs) 14:31, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hopefully some more editors will come by and make some of the wording more neutral. There is quite a bit of content that contains puffery, and could be construed as promotional in nature. What is your position with the company? Do you work for them, or are an independent representative for them? If you do have a personal affiliation with this company, I may suggest reading WP:COI#Declaring an interest if this applies to you.
- One more thing - the "controversy" section should be integrated into the text at the appropriate places per WP:NPOV#Article structure Leef5 14:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)