Misplaced Pages

Talk:Revolution Software/GA2

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Revolution Software

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jezhotwells (talk | contribs) at 14:24, 16 October 2011 (→GA Review: fail, clearly). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:24, 16 October 2011 by Jezhotwells (talk | contribs) (→GA Review: fail, clearly)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 7arazred (talk · contribs) 21:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead adequately summarises the article, see WP:LEAD
    The prose good, it is "reasonably well written".
    It's well organised, information is presented logically. Please read WP:MoS and subpages.
  2. It is accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    stable

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Shoddily put together, please read the good article criteria and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This artcile has not been reviewed. 7arazred simply copied and pasted Talk:Revolution Software/GA1 altering the failure points to passes. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)