Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wizardman

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 20:14, 27 October 2011 (Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 6d) to User talk:Wizardman/Archive39.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:14, 27 October 2011 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 6d) to User talk:Wizardman/Archive39.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.


Larger GT/FTs subsuming smaller ones

I thought that when a large-scale FT/GT was submitted that it subsumed smaller ones, like my Battlecruisers of the Royal Navy GT absorbed the individual class GTs. But the Armored cruisers of Germany GT didn't absorb the individual class GTs. I bring this up because the Battlecruisers of Japan GT that I just nominated should absorb the existing Kongo-class battlecruiser GT. And we wouldn't want to be inconsistent...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Scjessey is disruptive

I see that User:II mentions on ANI that Scjessey has been judged by the suitable committee, yourself included. I also see that Scjessey is still acting disruptively against other users. User II notes this, not me.

Therefore, I propose that Scjessey just be banned from the articles.

As for me, I am just making a few suggestions on the Obama and Perry articles, asking people to re-examine what is important. Trivial details, such as a trivial law passed, is not a significant part of a biography and shouldn't be there. I ahve no political agenda, either for or against the men. BAMP (talk) 18:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Please note the ongoing discussions at AN/I, renewed edit warring at Barack Obama (the above editor is now topic banned), a sockpuppet investigation at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Gaydenver, etc. I'd guess it's one of the old disruptive editors back for a new spin. - Wikidemon (talk) 20:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Brimstone (wrestler)

When will this page be unprotected? It has been protected for SIX MONTHS.Theclarkie (talk) 21:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Wizardman! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)