This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tamsier (talk | contribs) at 05:59, 13 November 2011 (→Chronique du Walo: Deleting copy and pasted from another source and passing it as chronique du Walo. Fraudster. How can Ndiadian be son of Abu Bakr when there is 250 yrs + separating them? Stupid woman.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:59, 13 November 2011 by Tamsier (talk | contribs) (→Chronique du Walo: Deleting copy and pasted from another source and passing it as chronique du Walo. Fraudster. How can Ndiadian be son of Abu Bakr when there is 250 yrs + separating them? Stupid woman.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Senegal River
In the article on the Senegal River you inserted a statement:
" The most credible theory which is backed by archaeological, migration and historical evidence is that, the name "Senegal" derives from the Serer people - "
The most credible theory? By whose judgment? I have never seen this assertion in the literature, so I am curious exactly who judged it "the most credible theory".
I am also curious as to how the "Senegal River", a name which was first jotted down by 15th C. Italian & Portuguese sources, when the Serer were nowhere near the area (and, indeed, a time when there was no communication between the Serer and the Portuguese), is "backed by archaeological, migration and historical evidence", which seems very bizarre assertion. Did you find an ancient marble slab in Italy indicating the name of the river? On what grounds are you perpretating this statement? Walrasiad (talk) 00:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
"Nowhere the area?" Where were they then in Mars having a cup tea and some bolo rei with Prince Henry the Navigator? Yes! The Serer people were not in communication with the Portuguse but I suggest you take a look at where this statement was made. In "etymology" with respect to the Wolof account. I suggest you look at the sources especially Diop etc. The Serer people know their history, language, religion and land better than any 15th century European slave trader like Alvise Cadamosto and his ilk, who hardly was in contact with them. Although the Portuguese tried to make contact with the Serers in 1446, almost all the adult members of that ship succumbed to Serer poisoned arrows. Serer Country is very verse and their language is embedded in the Wolof language who were in contact with the Portuguese. Take a look at the sources and where such account was made rather than coming here with your typical arrogant tone.
Tamsier (talk) 03:41, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
To allow others to participate, I have moved my reply to Talk:Sénégal River. You might wish to replicate your reply above there, if you want the sequence to make sense. Walrasiad (talk) 06:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)