This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cailil (talk | contribs) at 18:23, 5 December 2011 (ce). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:23, 5 December 2011 by Cailil (talk | contribs) (ce)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been?
- In the "Relationship to political movements" section the introduction
needs to be removed anda clear sentence should be added. Partly done - Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here. Partly done
- The "Late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries" section seems US-centric. What is going on in the rest of the world right now? Partly done
The movements & ideologies section may need reorganization in order to make it clearer and less complex for readers.DoneLead: mention feminism's effects on society, since that is a major part of the article.DoneSimilarly, the article has a picture some Parisian suffragettes, but France is not even mentioned in the article body.DoneLiterature section - the second two paragraphs may be overly specific, giving the names of a few important feminist texts instead of describing the general development of feminist literature as a whole. The entire period from 1818 until the 1960s is skipped over. Undue weight may be given to feminist science fiction.Done
Please see Talk:Feminism/GA1