This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guerillero (talk | contribs) at 06:37, 14 December 2011 (Notifying about declined speedy deletion (CSDH)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:37, 14 December 2011 by Guerillero (talk | contribs) (Notifying about declined speedy deletion (CSDH))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.
| Manual of Style (MoS) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | ||||||||||
| Formatting | ||||||||||
| Images | ||||||||||
| Layout | ||||||||||
| Lists | ||||||||||
By topic area
|
||||||||||
| Related guidelines | ||||||||||
|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
Welcome!
Hello, Vegaswikian, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:20, 17 March 2005 (UTC-5)
Category:Aviation terminology
I see you've put the terminology cat back in a few articles. Could you take a look at User:DexDor#Current_projects, which explains the reasons for the changes to categorizations, and let me know whether you agree or not. Thanks, DexDor (talk) 10:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- If the article is terminology, it belongs in the terminology categories. If is wrong to move it into a category about airlines when it is not an airline. The bottom line is that the category you are moving the article to must be correct. So in the one or two cases that I undid your change with a detailed edit comment, this was the case. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Prince Gong
Hi, it appears you recently moved the page Prince Gong (Qing dynasty). I do not believe the "Qing Dynasty" portion is necessary, since he is obviously the most commonly known Prince Gong in English literature. If you can, please just move it to Prince Gong. Colipon+(Talk) 23:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
George Knapp
I saw on the George Knapp article you were looking for info on which national Edward Murrow award Knapp won. According to the RTDNA website his station won the 2005 (not 2004) award for work on voter fraud. Doesn't mention Knapp specifically though.Nevadaresident (talk) 07:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Heroes' Cemetery
There's a post-move discussion on a rather hasty RM discussion that you closed. –HTD 16:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Closing after one week is normal and not hasty. Also there was no opposition to the move expressed. The only issue was which version of the name in English to use. Yes, there was a discussion that closed in 2009 without consensus to move. But having a second discussion does not mean we should be allowing more time. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Barber's pole
Vegaswikian, you wrote: "It has to be defining to be in a category" and removed a bunch of categories. To some extent, you create a discontinuity (send to an orphanage, so to speak) between that article and other articles in the subject matter. Just a thought. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
ArcelorMittal Orbit
You added the update tag to ArcelorMittal Orbit - that tag refers to descriptions on the talk page. Please can you add there a note of your concerns. -- Beardo (talk) 20:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Controversial move
Would you please revert the controversial move recently made by Saint0wen. He moved moved Ales Kranjc to Aleš Kranjc over a redirect, and clearly ignoring the edit history and talk page for this article. Recent discussion have confirmed that moves involving diacritics are controversial and therefore must go the RM route. Cheers. Dolovis (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: A38 (dairy product)
Hello Vegaswikian, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of A38 (dairy product), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Long enough to pass A3. This is about a product not a corperation,. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Guerillero | My Talk 06:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)