This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hildanknight (talk | contribs) at 16:09, 18 December 2011 (There certainly is potential for historical impact, so I suggest closing the nomination as premature and renominating in several months if there turns out to be no historical impact.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:09, 18 December 2011 by Hildanknight (talk | contribs) (There certainly is potential for historical impact, so I suggest closing the nomination as premature and renominating in several months if there turns out to be no historical impact.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)2011 MRT train disrputions
- 2011 MRT train disrputions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOT NEWs. Local events, no evidence for connection between them, no reason to think historic impact; all transit systems has disruptions from day to day, but keeping a log of them is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. DGG ( talk ) 23:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Utterly trivial. Even the title got disrputed (sic)! Clarityfiend (talk) 02:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment The article has been moved to correct the misspelling in the original title. Should the AFD be moved too? According to The New Paper, the disruptions this week are the worst in the history of the MRT, their CEO considered resigning and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced a public investigation. Since the disruptions are a current event, we cannot assess historical impact yet, but there certainly is potential for historical impact. Hence I suggest closing this nomination as premature and give the article several months to develop, after which the article can be renominated if the press coverage quickly stops and there turns out to be no real historical impact. --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 16:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)