Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anwar saadat (talk | contribs) at 10:43, 13 April 2006 (→POV). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Wikiproject Indian cinema

Vandals beware

I find somebody deleting and/or rewinding to old edition thw whole article without bothering to discuss what's his problem. Can somebody identify/report him? I bet he is Vijay fan! :-ppp

Go to ajithfans.com,not here

See,I am also an admirer of Ajith.But don't overglorify him or write wrong things here.See,in an interview to rerdiff.com,he felt sad that all his 5 1997 releases were flops despite giving 3 megahits in 1996.And someone here writes that nesam,ullasam,raasi were musical hits!If you want to flatter him,go to ajithfans.com,not here;for this a place known for its neutral stance.I had tried to correct it twice ;but some mad fan spoils my effort!This is happening only with vijay and ajith's articles.Mad fans they are! -S.GaneshKumar

Be Neutral..This is not a fan Blog

Yes Mr. Ganesh, see i was the one who expanded this stub article of Thala Ajith by adding pictures and details...but see some other fan overglorified it...and even i feel bad about the article...I have even mailed in the yahoogroups that u dont need to exaggerate events about Thala to make it fascinating..bcoz it naturally is fascinating...the beauty of Ajiths story is his come back...when he is written down and out...he bounces back with full energy...Fan who is editing this article shud understand that im Ajith fanatic... Even Ajith wont like the article...BE HONEST.

prathap

Limit photos

Please limit photos of films to one per year to avoid clutter. Anwar saadat 23:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Try adding the song links to the table and it will look perfect. The photos are good.

Soz for any disturbances Prin

Message to User: Anwar Saadat

Please leave if you are going to continuously vandalise the ajith page. Just cos u are a vijay fan it does not give u special rights to vandalise the ajith page. I have created a table with ajith films. Don't u dere delete it again. Others such as User:Prin and User:arunprasad have helped with thi success of the ajith page. Can you now please have the decentcy to leave it alone.

User: The Man's Plan

Dude, you are the one who is vandalising Ajith's page. I am a Ajith fan. Stop removing links to songs, trailers, whole paragraphs, Telugu filmography and white spaces. Anyway I have already reported your troll bcoz you don't have the decency to stick to the format or even discuss about major template changes. Don't you dare come revert back to ur vandalism again. Anwar saadat 11:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Content dispute

The users Anwar saadat and Prin, including some suspected sockpuppets, have recently been involved in a reversion war in the Ajith article. This is distracting and confusing for other editors trying to edit the page, so I'm going to ask the involved parties to stop reverting until they can agree on a suitable version. Please note that both of you have already violated the three-revert rule.

As far as I can tell, the only major difference between the two versions that each of you advocate is the format of the filmography. Anwar prefers a bulleted list with external links to raaga.com and indiaglitz.com, while Prin prefers the {{ActingFilmography}} templates. Neither version is incorrect, and neither version is vandalism. They are two different ways of presenting practically the same information. Personally, I don't see the point in using a complicated set of templates when a list works just fine and is more flexible. Then again, the templates do add aesthetic pleasure to the article.

If there are any other significant differences between your respective verions, please explain them specifically so that I can understand exactly what the problem is.

Once again, if either of you revert the article before reaching an agreement (especially within 24 hours), you will be cited for violation of the three-revert rule. And even more importantly, do not change or remove other users' signed comments on this talk page or any other pages. Thank you. --TantalumTelluride 19:41, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Prin has reverted the article again without bothering to discuss. All links to songs, trailers, Telugu filmography, whole paragraphs are lost now. Thank You! Anwar saadat 20:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Mango Team?

When did Ajith race for Mango Team? LOL

Style

While you're fighting over the filmography hasn't anyone noticed the rather bad way in which this article is written? What's up with all those exclamation marks? If someone were to try and edit this article to do something about the very bad style all their changes would be lost once it gets reverted again. You are really not making the article any better with your juvenile bickering.
As fans of Ajith you should be trying to make his article better, not worse. Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 06:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Exactly what's wrong with the article? We have covered almost all major milestones in Ajith's film career. Anwar saadat 07:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Almost every paragraph in the Film Career section ends with an exclamation mark - it reads more like a fansite than an article. The paragraphs also seem to be double spaced - take a look at other articles on Misplaced Pages, you only need one line between paragraphs. I'm nowhere near informed on this subject but it looks like this article could be great, but the style does need revising. --Casiotone 12:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

POV

The most hagiographic article on WP?? The whole article is utterly ridiculous. I tried to do some rephrasing, but someone who has watched more of his films will have to intervene because the content is also rather ridiculous.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 07:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Its not POV. Editors who negate this article as such have their own POVs that are anti-Ajith and pro-Vijay. For instance, if they give evidence as to the box office status of a film, we can accept it. But they don't and simply brand it as a flop on the basis of tabloid. However fanclubs have access to trade books and know exactly the worth of their icon. This article is as brutally honest as it gets. Anwar saadat 10:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)