Misplaced Pages

User talk:Amaury

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amaury (talk | contribs) at 02:58, 2 June 2012 (→Excuse me: Reply.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:58, 2 June 2012 by Amaury (talk | contribs) (→Excuse me: Reply.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Last updated: 6/1/2012
It is approximately 3:31 AM where this user lives.


User:Donald Duck/Navbar

Hello! Welcome to my talk page!
Please feel free to to leave me a message, whether it's informing me of something
I screwed up, just to say hello, or anything else! I won't bite!

I have a few requests that I hope you'll respect while posting here:

  1. First and above all, be civil.
    • If you don't agree with an action I made, be it reverted you and left a warning, marked your page for deletion, or anything else, please be calm and polite. I am a reasonable man, and we'll straighten it out a lot quicker without screaming and name calling.
  2. Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~)
  3. Please start new conversations at the bottom.
  4. I generally like to keep conversations together.
    • If you post here, I'll reply here and leave you a message informing you of my reply.
    • If I leave you a message on your talk page, I'll keep watching it, but if you want to make sure I notice it quickly, leave me a {{talkback}} template.
      • I always keep conversations together. If we separate the messages, no big deal, I'll probably go back and cross post here.
  5. Start new discussions with a level three heading.
Since that is out of the way, please click here and leave a message!
Archives
2009
2010
2011
2012

June 2012

Excuse me =

In this edit you labeled my removal of inappropriate material as vandalism. However, let it be known that the material you re-added is unencyclopedic (for example, the quotes section) and unstylistic (for example, the external link in the prose that directed a user to an unverified document of largely irrelevant information). Please be more careful next time. 99.144.114.54 (talk) 02:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

My apologies. That should have been a neutral revert with a removal of content warning, not a vandalism warning. In the future, though, I would use edit summaries to make it clear what you are doing so someone coming along doesn't mistake it as nonconstructive. Cheers! - Zhou Yu (talk) 02:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)