This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.7.164.82 (talk) at 15:03, 22 April 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:03, 22 April 2006 by 86.7.164.82 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Michael Keith Smith (b.1952) is the chairman of the Conservative Democratic Alliance (CDA), and an activist in the United Kingdom Independence Party. He was formerly on the Executive Council of the Conservative Monday Club, of which he has been a member since the early 1970s. Professionally he is a Chartered Surveyor.
He had been expelled from the Conservative Party in May 2002 for attacking Iain Duncan Smith in print and threatening to stand against an official Conservative Candidate, (refer: The Independent, 18 May 2002). He subsequently challenged this unlawful expulsion with a Writ. He was readmitted before it reached court and his costs paid by Central Office.
On 27 June 2002, The Daily Telegraph carried a letter from the CDA, signed by Smith as its Chairman, attacking the Conservative Party and its Chairman Francis Maude for "the sleaze, double-dealing, arrogance, incompetence, Europhilia, indifference and drift with which the party is still associated. Voters", he said, "deserve a real alternative to Blairism and his 'straight kinda guy' chicanery. Mr.Maude and his C-Changing Tories are incapable of providing it."
In the 2005 General Election he stood as the United Kingdom Independence Party candidate for Portsmouth North. Both unsuccessful Tory candidate Penny Mordaunt and political commentator Richard North blamed Smith's intervention for the Tories' failure to win back the seat.
Michael Keith Smith recently won a major test case for libel over the internet against a former schoolteacher. He was awarded £10,000 plus £7500 costs. Refer: The Times, 21 March 2006, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2096902,00.html IT Week, and The Guardian, both 22 March 2006, http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1737001,00.html?gusrc=rss
Although Mike Smith won the test case technically, he has not and will not receive a penny of either the award or the costs. In light of this fact Mike Smith is now claiming a . Post Number 1211.
The injunction Mr. Smith served against the defendent has also not been served, so all in all, test case or not, it is a pretty expensive and pointless enterprise the only result being and attempt by a CDA, right wing UKIP candidate to claim a 'moral victory'.
Category: