Misplaced Pages

Talk:World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference of 1999

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SchuminWeb (talk | contribs) at 02:16, 18 May 2006 (Views on the conference). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:16, 18 May 2006 by SchuminWeb (talk | contribs) (Views on the conference)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

To discuss the article regarding the massive demonstrations in Seattle protesting this conference, see Talk:WTO Ministerial Conference of 1999 protest activity.

Art Thiel, the sports columnist

Was stating his opinion about the conference. He hardly represents the voice of Seattle opinion about the conference pre-event. Both the Times and PI reported universal support for the conference prior to its occurrence. To suggest that there was widespread, or any opposition, pre-event, is wishful thinking. All sorts of people found reasons after the riots occurred, of course, but that's typical Monday-morning-quarterbacking. Please stop adding your pro-Anarchist POV into these kinds of articles. Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox. Morton devonshire 03:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Regardless of what his normal column is, I still consider it worthwhile to include. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
When did your melon become the benchmark for what is or isn't notable? Go back and look at pre-conference reports in the PI and Times -- there wasn't any opposition to holding the conference. Morton devonshire 03:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I could say the same for you and your "melon". But rather than remove material, why don't you cite something that backs up your point? SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
That would be your pro-protestor POV speaking. It makes perfect sense to list the prior opposition to the Conference, but I can't find anything in the Times or PI that discusses it -- if it's there, please go ahead and include it in the article. As to Art Thiel's rant, give me a break. Please pick a subject you actually know something about -- you were not around here when the event happened, are not a Seattle resident, and you are not familiar with any of the media accounts that were presented during the event. All you have as a frame of reference are Anarachist ramblings about the event and an obviously POV perspective. Misplaced Pages is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not an arm of the Black Bloc movement. Morton devonshire 17:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Given that, by most accounts, half of the protestors were from Seattle or the immediate area (and most of the rest were housed by people from Seattle or the immediate area , the claim of universal support seems pretty bizarre. - Jmabel | Talk 04:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The Castro invitation

This may give an idea of the level of Seattle's ambivalence about the event: in August before the Ministerial, five (out of nine) Seattle City Council members (at the behest of a Seattle congressman) extended an invitation to Fidel Castro to attend. (; the latter portion of the article is unfortunately cut off. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Views on the conference

Now let's find other sources of opinions to add to in this section in addition to Art Thiel. I'd be interested to see what the thought about it was before the event, as well as more afterward opinions. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)