Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheMadTim (talk | contribs) at 17:17, 2 May 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

TheMadTim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The 'civility' issue centres around my labelling of ] as a liar. The claim is validated by reference to in which KarateKid7 claims that "Comment The page has been locked to prevent TheMadTim from vandalising the page. KarateKid7 03:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)". When I asked the admin who locked the page, ], whether or not this was true , ] replied "Absolutely not, however I HAVE protected the article Davie Dodds and hope that everyone will edit civilly regarding it.". KarateKid7 is a liar, and as part of ], I think it was important to show that. I therefore request to be unblocked on the basis of the aforementioned |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The 'civility' issue centres around my labelling of ] as a liar. The claim is validated by reference to in which KarateKid7 claims that "Comment The page has been locked to prevent TheMadTim from vandalising the page. KarateKid7 03:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)". When I asked the admin who locked the page, ], whether or not this was true , ] replied "Absolutely not, however I HAVE protected the article Davie Dodds and hope that everyone will edit civilly regarding it.". KarateKid7 is a liar, and as part of ], I think it was important to show that. I therefore request to be unblocked on the basis of the aforementioned |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The 'civility' issue centres around my labelling of ] as a liar. The claim is validated by reference to in which KarateKid7 claims that "Comment The page has been locked to prevent TheMadTim from vandalising the page. KarateKid7 03:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)". When I asked the admin who locked the page, ], whether or not this was true , ] replied "Absolutely not, however I HAVE protected the article Davie Dodds and hope that everyone will edit civilly regarding it.". KarateKid7 is a liar, and as part of ], I think it was important to show that. I therefore request to be unblocked on the basis of the aforementioned |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Hello, TheMadTim, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

--ΜιĿːtalk 10:33, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Hello there. Thanks for your interest in and contributions to Misplaced Pages. For pictures, Picture tutorial should help. Note however that you may upload pictures to Misplaced Pages only if it does not involve any copyeright violations. It is always good to take some time off editing in the begining and understanding the rules and guidelines. Good luck! --ΜιĿːtalk 10:45, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Thx dude!--TheMadTim 10:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

(See, I can add a signature and everything now!) ;)

Glasgow Celtic

Who are you to delete anything from Glasgow Celtic, a topic of which you are almost definitely completely ignorant??

Stay out of other people's work products until you have one of your own. 216.194.5.238 17:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

To the user at 216.194.5.238, please do not verbally harass wikipedians. Please be WP:CIVIL and refrian from personal attacks, or action will be taken.--Oni Ookami Alfador 17:32, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Amazing Racist

I've undeleted the most recent edit before the original Articles for Deletion debate, and placed it at User:TheMadTim/Amazing Racist so you can read it. David | Talk 19:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Sectarian Scottish football

The discussion had been created in the wrong place, so I fixed it. You can now access it directly from your original article by clicking on the link, or go to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/History of Sectarianism in Scottish Football. Fan1967 02:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah thanks for that man, it was a pain in the arse to edit where it was. I found it further down the page dude, sorry to hassle you Holmes. Thanks for your help dude. --TheMadTim 02:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Question re: Talk:Davie Dodds

Absolutely not, however I HAVE protected the article Davie Dodds and hope that everyone will edit civilly regarding it. I will remove the protection in a few days. I would only protect a mainspace talk page in extreme circumstances. I am also not involving myself in the 3RR report, other than to note that the article is protected. — xaosflux 03:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

K dude, thx for the expedient reply. --TheMadTim 03:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. KarateKid7 15:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Davie dodds.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Davie dodds.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Misplaced Pages:Image use policy
• Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 23:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

Just letting you know that I've closed this deletion discussion early. The reason for this is that in the first 24 hours of the discussion, there were 16 keeps and no deletes, other than your own. I am not asserting that the nomination was improper, merely that there is no point keeping it on AFD for the five days when it already has such a high level of support to keep. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

LOL, It doesn't really dude. there are just a lot of sock puppets. =] --TheMadTim 11:03, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours because of incivility and revert warring, as well as to enforce a cooldown. I recommend a cup of tea in the meantime. Please try to discuss changes (civilly) on talk pages before reverting, please. —BorgHunter (talk) 15:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

OK Dude No probs. The dude is a total liar tho, and I stand by what I said. =] --TheMadTim 15:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

KarateKid7 posing as TheMADTim

LMAO. KarateKid7 is now using the username TheMADTim to insert comments over which we have previously had revert disputes. . I strongly urge admin to look at this user and to ban them, and all of the other accounts they use. --TheMadTim 17:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock