Misplaced Pages

Archive 1 | Illegal ban by Jdforrester

Hello all,

If you have a complaint of a revert I did or any other changes I made to a article here please comment below with the article name/link and why I was wrong or right. Please make sure you sign all comments with 4 ~ 'tidals'.

Cheers, Scott

Comments/Talk

Master Jay's RfA

Thanks Scott once again for your support at my recent RfA. If you have any concerns, feel free to leave me a note. Thanks --Jay(Reply) 02:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

malta

you reverted an edit i made about malta being the most bombed place on earth. unless the nature of this claim is elaborated then it is false since interpretation of "most bombed" can very the germans put less then 10000 tons on the island, many other countries received more then this in that war. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.124.30.55 (talk • contribs)

Your mistaken unsigned/anon user. The history of Malta doesn't even show a rollback/rv of me at all. Never even been to the page nor do I really care. --Scott Grayban 02:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Block of User:Adam Carr

I have blocked him for three hours for personal attacks against you and other users on Talk:Cuba. However, I am also asking you to keep your cool and, if he still continues to attack you, you must also keep calm and respond approprately. Thank you. Kilo-Lima| 13:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Its very hard to be nice to him when he gets mad and starts name calling. He really gets bad when his own sources he uses is used against him as he did just recently and then ends up attacking my ethnic background as a defense. Its gotten out of hand and I started a RfC on him with many diff's on his attacks on users because they point out parts that are positive about Cuba. So now this is a second block concerning his actions on Cuba. --Scott Grayban 13:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks against Adam Carr

Your continued personal attacks against Adam Carr, such as "Growup", "your basing your edits on the pro-right-wing American politics and you totally ignore that", "Sorry your brain doesn't work on all levels of reasoning here but mine does", "your edits/comments/claims are very biased because you're using your Governments claims and posistion" on talk:Cuba are unnaceptable. Please refrain in the future. Xtra 14:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Pfft far from a personal attack and especially after he calls me a communist more then once and attacks my ethnic background. --Scott Grayban 14:09, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Even, if he did, that is no excuse for some of your comments and patronising tones. Xtra 14:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

If any of my actions on any personal attacks that you or any other admin see fit is a violation then block me. But if your siding with Adam because I have many valid reasons for my RfC on him then back off. I have proof that PMA who is a admin here has directly told Adam to be un-civil. That is enough there to have PMA removed as a admin here. I wont be threatened, insulted or dis-credited because of my RfC on him. --Scott Grayban 14:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

All I am saying is, consider your comments before you save the page. Xtra 14:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough. I will be more carefull on what I say and provide factual content with sources. --Scott Grayban 14:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Scott, It is interesting to notice that this incivility was a back and forth process. If you do not respond, you break the cycle. Also, you have the right and duty to simply strike or modify the uncivil language to be more civil. That is something affirmative you can do to bring civility back to this place on Misplaced Pages. BruceHallman 16:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

First of all I tried to ignore his insults and name calling this last round. I even used the same resources he claims he users and I found information that he just left out of the human rights section. When I called him on it thats when he started his insulting and finally attacking my ethnic background and implying I'm some sort of nazi. I have been more then patient with him about all this. Alot of us including the moderators have asked him to stop the attacking. I don't even edit the article is fear that he will attack me for being a communist or fidelist and then have a revert war all over again. When does it end? Who ends it so that the article contains all information and not just selective negative info? I read the article and there is nothing on the positive side about Cuba at all. Nothing that even honours the ones in Cuba for fighting for human rights. Not one thing. Its so out of whack its not even funny anymore. Adam simply wants that article show all the negative there is about Cuba . I bet if he had his way that article would only say Cuba is run by a communist dictator and no one has any rights As it is there is zero credit to the activist for human rights or there accomplishments. That is just wrong. --Scott Grayban 16:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

And another thing. If I followed the WP:Civility#Removing_uncivil_comments that could also be taken as a violation of removing talk page comments which Adam would only use or try to use in his favour to draw the attention away from him as he done in the past. --Scott Grayban 16:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

And all this is just as frustrating when non other people involved with this and are the brunt end of Adam's attacks refuses to even stop him. It shows that no one wants a real WP:NPOV or wants it to drag out until there no energy left to dispute Adam and his force of POV. --Scott Grayban 16:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Cuba

Please explain why you describe my contribution as "nonsense". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.108.37.36 (talk • contribs)

Well first off your an anon IP. Second those edits have been settled and sourced and third they reflect the same attitude and wording exactly those of Adam Carr so in light of that I reverted your copy-cat edits that Adam wants to impose on the article. --Scott Grayban 17:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

It appears that things have cooled off from a few hours ago. Nonetheless, I will keep an eye on things if they continue to get out of control. --Jay(Reply) 18:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I was wondering who the last comment you made on my talk page was directed at. --Jay(Reply) 19:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

User:172 --Scott Grayban 19:53, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Blocked again

Per our policy on legal threats and this edit, you are blocked until your legal action is concluded or withdrawn. Leave a message with the {{unblock}} template when this happens. --Sam Blanning 08:51, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I wont be asking for a unblock. The edit was archived if you had looked above. And now each and every admin that has supported this block will be named in my lawsuit, I am not kidding on this. Misplaced Pages has NO LEGAL AUTHORITY to monitor emails sent, I never violated any wikipedia policy and even if it does according to your thinking its illegal. Better read the laws on email privacy because I have become Wikimedia & Misplaced Pages's worse nightmare. Mr. Carr I am coming and you can't stop me no matter how many trolling admin back you here. --71.32.15.193 12:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

BTW watch my blog and The Miami Herald because when I am done wikimedia and all you lowlife admin will be owned by me for violating my right to privacy and illegal use of private information. --71.32.15.193 12:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Sgrayban (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Jimbo Whales here I come and hell follow's me |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Jimbo Whales here I come and hell follow's me |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Jimbo Whales here I come and hell follow's me |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}