This is an old revision of this page, as edited by IronKnuckle (talk | contribs) at 17:19, 22 January 2013 (→Oy vay...: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:19, 22 January 2013 by IronKnuckle (talk | contribs) (→Oy vay...: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Welcome!
Hello, IronKnuckle, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Misplaced Pages's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well I admit I'm not feeling very welcome right now, and my point of view is neutral. IronKnuckle (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you take any criticism of your purely destructive 'contributions' here as a personal attack, you will feel that way. But you are plainly not neutral, and I frankly don't care if you can't tell reasoned criticism from a personal attack. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- They arent purely destructive, and for you to say so without evidence is quite foolish. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Fine. I've looked at your contributions listing. I can't find this non-destructive evidence you claim exists. Can you provide me with even a single diff, dated earlier than the time of this comment, where you edit a page in the main article space, other than to include or amend an AfD? AlexTiefling (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- I request you leave my page and stop editing on it. I request no more contact from you. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- You're free to delete my comments. I'll certainly be taking yours off my Talk page shortly. But you told me that there was no evidence that your contributions had been solely destructive. That looked like asking me to prove a negative, so I just asked you for a single confirming instance of your own claim. I'm not surprised you tried driving me away instead, but as you began this conversation, you should recognise the consequences of doing so. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- I requested no futher contact from you, yet you persist, I feel you are harassing me now. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- You're free to delete my comments. I'll certainly be taking yours off my Talk page shortly. But you told me that there was no evidence that your contributions had been solely destructive. That looked like asking me to prove a negative, so I just asked you for a single confirming instance of your own claim. I'm not surprised you tried driving me away instead, but as you began this conversation, you should recognise the consequences of doing so. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- I request you leave my page and stop editing on it. I request no more contact from you. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Fine. I've looked at your contributions listing. I can't find this non-destructive evidence you claim exists. Can you provide me with even a single diff, dated earlier than the time of this comment, where you edit a page in the main article space, other than to include or amend an AfD? AlexTiefling (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- They arent purely destructive, and for you to say so without evidence is quite foolish. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you take any criticism of your purely destructive 'contributions' here as a personal attack, you will feel that way. But you are plainly not neutral, and I frankly don't care if you can't tell reasoned criticism from a personal attack. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Chameleon
Hello, Chameleon (film) has been overhauled. Can you please review the current revision as well as the comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chameleon (film)? Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 16:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yea I'm a bit tied up right now, being harassed by gun control supporters who dont like my AfD's. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Oy vay...
IronKnuckle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why was I blocked for being a sockpuppet? A sock puppet of who? There is no proof of this, and the CheckUser said I was unrelated. I dont understand why I would be blocked for this. I have done nothing wrong. It it's already been proven I'm not a sock...Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Why was I blocked for being a sockpuppet? A sock puppet of who? There is no proof of this, and the CheckUser said I was unrelated. I dont understand why I would be blocked for this. I have done nothing wrong. It it's already been proven I'm not a sock... |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Why was I blocked for being a sockpuppet? A sock puppet of who? There is no proof of this, and the CheckUser said I was unrelated. I dont understand why I would be blocked for this. I have done nothing wrong. It it's already been proven I'm not a sock... |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Why was I blocked for being a sockpuppet? A sock puppet of who? There is no proof of this, and the CheckUser said I was unrelated. I dont understand why I would be blocked for this. I have done nothing wrong. It it's already been proven I'm not a sock... |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}