Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Bushranger (talk | contribs) at 09:51, 28 January 2013 (Closing debate, result was redirect to University of Florida#Career placement). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to University of Florida#Career placement. Content was WP:BOLDly merged to the target; given the !vote, low participation, and attribution requirements, closing this as redirect seems the logical result at this point. (It's worth noting that redirects take up less server space than deletion.) The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

University of Florida Career Resource Center

University of Florida Career Resource Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

That this was ranked as good by Princeton Review doesn't mean the resource center gets to have its own article. I've never seen an article on a notable career resource center, and this is not one that deserves it. Drmies (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

• Delete WP:MILL student service similar to ones found in most colleges. It's mentioned in J. Wayne Reitz Union, as it probably should be, but I don't think it's worth a redirect. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 05:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

• Redirect. Subject is clearly notable based on the results of a simple Google News search and the WP:GNG criteria, but I question whether there is enough general interest encyclopedic content to justify a stand-alone article. Any encyclopedic content not already duplicated by the J. Wayne Reitz Student Union or main University of Florida articles should be merged to the main University of Florida article, with a section-specific redirect to the same. Career placement is a key function of the university worthy of mention in the main article. As for the subject not being "worth a redirect," I gently remind Andrew that redirects are cheap (see essay "Misplaced Pages:Redirects are cheap"). Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
• Redirect. Should be redirected to an appropriate article. Information provided is informative and notable according to Princeton Review. Jccort (talk) 13:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
• Either delete or redirect to J. Wayne Reitz Union, per nom and Jccort. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

• Delete Not even worth redirection. A routine student service center at a university. The fact that the center exists is in the main article, and that's all the content needed. it's not a reasonable search term, so no need of a redirection. Redirects are cheap, but redirects when there's no significant information are confusing and have a negative value. DGG ( talk ) 03:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
• Comment. In the spirit of BRD, and given that no one is advocating that we keep this subject as a stand-alone article, I have taken the liberty of merging the content to a two-paragraph section within the main University of Florida article, which is where it probably should have gone in the first place. Given the relatively trivial difference between a redirect and deletion at this point, may I suggest that we close this AfD and move one to more meaningful AfD discussions? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.