Misplaced Pages

Talk:Military camouflage

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chiswick Chap (talk | contribs) at 08:08, 28 January 2013 (Archiving...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:08, 28 January 2013 by Chiswick Chap (talk | contribs) (Archiving...)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articlesMilitary camouflage has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 27, 2013. (Reviewed version).
A summary of this article appears in camouflage.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

/Archive to 2011 /Archive 2012 /Archive 2013

Categories: