This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ched (talk | contribs) at 20:01, 25 July 2013 (→I am honored: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:01, 25 July 2013 by Ched (talk | contribs) (→I am honored: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Rollback
Dear Lady Catherine (or, as I may again call you, mrs Rollbacker), welcome back to us! I noticed that you had apparently mislaid your rollback rights somewhere in the Alps or the Carribbean. I have reinstated them. Enjoy, and remember to only use the feature for obvious vandalism (not for the merely distasteful or middleclass). Bishonen | talk 23:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC).
Editor of the Week
As you so Royally observed at User:Wetmans page, your exalted status and buldging Trophy Case exclude you from consideration for this Award. It is designed to reward the common folk for their hard and dillegent efforts on behalf of The Encyclopedia. I ask your leave, dear Lady.....```Buster Seven Talk 15:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- I so admire projects that are "pour l'encouragement des autres" and am happy to lend my name and patronage to such schemes. May I say how nice it is to see such a nice, well brought up young man on my page; Wikipdia needs more like you - you should stand for Arbcom; one can't help feeling the present members (apart from poor, little Mrs Risker who's Canadian!) are rather 'infra dignitatem' - I appoint them you know, but I'm very constitutional; the whole world seems rather dumbed down these days and lacking in finesse. The Lady Catherine de Burgh (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
I am honored
Lady Catherine, I am most honored and humbled that you have taken note of me. I greatly thank you for having not only read what I have posted, but to take your most valuable time to respond to me. You are of course very correct that I expressed myself poorly in regards to my thoughts of your nephew Giano. What I should have expressed is that Giano appears to disagree with some of the "posts" that Andy has made, and I very incorrectly posted that it was a dislike for a "person". I do thank you for very kindly reminding me of facts without chastising me in a fashion which I must admit that I likely deserved. <bows respectfully> — Ched : ? 20:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)