This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eurisarukovci (talk | contribs) at 22:12, 25 February 2013 (Please restore what you think needs to be restored.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:12, 25 February 2013 by Eurisarukovci (talk | contribs) (Please restore what you think needs to be restored.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Eurisarukovci, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Eurisarukovci! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
New user?
Hi,
Are you new user or returning old one?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm a new user, and I took part in a project with wikiacademy to add as much information about Kosovo. I did a lot of research and wanted to make the timeline as good as I could. The references that I had gave me this information. However, I was just told that I should have just added on the existing timeline or should have talked to you from the beginning. I have a lot of information I think would be useful to the Timeline. Would it be all right if I just incorporated the timeline that I created into the existing one? Any changes you think should be made are of course welcome.
- Thanks for your reply. Yes, you were wrong. You should not remove the text of the existing timeline. Nor it would not be allright to incorporate the timeline that you created into the existing one because it has important flaws. Please try to first resolve some issues I pointed at and then propose the draft on the talkpage.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Would you please restore the Serbian rulers, as I have not researched and studied that information yet. As for " Territories which are Albanian 600 years before Albanians were mentioned for the first time" could point out where you think those flaws are made and I will provide more references by worldwide authors. As for the buildings (Churches and mosques along other things), maybe we could create a sort of 'building timeline' (loosely phrased, but you probably get the idea) and incorporate all the material in another article. My opinion is that it doesn't really belong in a "historical" timeline per se... What do you think? Thank you! Cheers and may we make this timeline as educative and complete as we can! :)
- Thanks for your reply. Yes, you were wrong. You should not remove the text of the existing timeline. Nor it would not be allright to incorporate the timeline that you created into the existing one because it has important flaws. Please try to first resolve some issues I pointed at and then propose the draft on the talkpage.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)