Misplaced Pages

The Bible and homosexuality

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by William Avery (talk | contribs) at 15:01, 3 March 2013 (Per MOS:LQ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:01, 3 March 2013 by William Avery (talk | contribs) (Per MOS:LQ)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Part of a series on
Christianity and LGBTQ topics
Overview articles
Denominational positions
LGBT Christian clergy
LGBTQ portal

The Bible refers to sexual practices that may be called "homosexual" in today's world, but the original language texts of the Bible do not refer explicitly to homosexuality as a sexual orientation. The Bible is interpreted by officials in some denominations as condemning the practice. In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, however, the extent to which the Bible mentions the subject and whether or not it is condemned, has become the subject of debate.

Passages in the Old Testament book Leviticus that prohibit "lying with mankind as with womankind" and the story of Sodom and Gomorrah have historically been interpreted as condemning homosexuality, as have several Pauline passages. Other interpreters, however, maintain that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality, saying that historical context suggests other interpretations or that rare or unusual words in the passages may not be referring to homosexuality. In Religion Dispatches magazine, Candace Chellew-Hodge argues that the six or so verses that are often cited to condemn LGBT people are referring instead to "abusive sex". She states that the Bible has no condemnation for "loving, committed, gay and lesbian relationships" and that Jesus was silent on the subject.

Hebrew Bible

Main article: Homosexuality in the Hebrew Bible

Leviticus 18 and 20

Chapters 18 and 20 of Leviticus, which form part of the Holiness code, contain the following verses:

22 Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. (Leviticus 18:22 NIV)
13 “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. (Leviticus 20:13 NIV)

The two verses have historically been interpreted by Jews and Christians as clear blanket prohibitions against homosexual acts.

References to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible

See also: Sodom and Gomorrah

The story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis does not explicitly identify homosexuality as the sin for which they were destroyed, but the passage has historically been interpreted within Judaism and Christianity as a punishment for homosexuality due to the interpretation that the men of Sodom wished to rape the angels who retrieved Lot. While the sin of Sodom was not interpreted by Jewish prophets as sexual but rather as pride or lack of charity, the sexual interpretation became so prevalent that the name "Sodom" became the basis of the word sodomy, still a legal synonym for homosexual and non-procreative sexual acts, particularly anal or oral sex.

While the Jewish prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, Amos and Zephaniah refer vaguely to the sin of Sodom, Ezekiel specifies that the city was destroyed because of its arrogance, apathy towards the poor, and committing "abomination", the word used in Leviticus 18 and 20 in reference to homosexual acts, as well as in other parts of the Bible to refer to various forms of idolatry and other undesirable actions. The Talmudic tradition of between c. 370 and 500 follows Ezekiel's interpretation of the sin of Sodom as lack of charity, as does Jesus in the New Testament, for instance in Matthew 10:14-15 when he tells his disciples that the punishment for houses or towns that will not welcome them will be worse than that of Sodom and Gomorrah. According to some interpretations, the use of "abomination" in the context of Ezekiel 16:49-50 is a reference to the attempted homosexual rape in the Genesis story.

Later traditions on Sodom's sin considered it to be an illicit form of heterosexual intercourse. In Jude 1:7 the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah are stated to have given themselves "up to sexual immorality and perversion." Later Jewish writers Philo (d. AD 50)and Josephus (37 – c. 100) were the first to assert unambiguously that homosexuality was among the sins of Sodom. By the end of the 1st century Jews commonly identified the sin of Sodom with homosexual practices.

David and Jonathan and Ruth and Naomi

The account of the friendship between David and Jonathan in the Books of Samuel has been interpreted by traditional and mainstream Christians as a relationship only of affectionate regard, but has been interpreted by some authors as of a sexual nature. The story of Ruth and Naomi is also occasionally interpreted in this way.

New Testament

Main article: Homosexuality in the New Testament

Romans 1

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.(Romans 1:26-27 NIV)

This passage has been debated by some twentieth and twenty-first century interpreters both in terms of its relevance today and in terms of its actual prohibition. While Christians of all denominations have historically maintained that this verse is a complete prohibition of all forms of homosexuality, some twentieth and twenty-first century authors contend the passage is not a blanket condemnation of homosexuality at all. Others interpreters have argued that Paul's writings must be considered fallible, due in part to his views about slavery and women.

Other Epistles

In the context of the broader immorality of his audience, Paul of Tarsus wrote in the First Epistle to the Corinthians,

9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor malakoi, arsenokoitai, 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. (1 Corinthians 6:9-11 NIV)

The word arsenokoitai (ἀρσενοκοῖται) in verse 9 has challenged scholars for centuries, and has been variously rendered as "abusers of themselves with mankind" (KJV), "sodomites" (YLT), or "men who practice homosexuality" (NIV). Greek ἄῤῥην / ἄρσην means "male", and κοίτην "bed," with a sexual connotation. Paul's use of the word in 1 Corinthians is the earliest example of the term; its only other use is in a similar list of wrongdoers given (possibly by the same author) in 1 Timothy 1:8–11:

8 We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. 9 We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for the sexually immoral, for arsenokoitai, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine 11 that conforms to the gospel concerning the glory of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.(1 Timothy 1:8–11 NIV)

In later Christian literature the word appears in the writings of 6th-century Patriarch John IV of Constantinople. In a passage dealing with sexual misconduct, he speaks of arsenokoitia as active or passive and says that "many men even commit the sin of arsenokoitia with their wives". Although the constituent elements of the compound word refer to sleeping with men, he obviously does not use it to mean homosexual intercourse and appears to employ it for anal intercourse, not generic homosexual activity.

Other scholars have interpreted malakoi and arsenokoitai as referring to weakness and effeminacy, or to the practice of exploitative pederasty.

Matthew 8; Luke 7

Further information: Homosexuality in the New Testament § Pais, and Healing the centurion's servant

In Matthew 8:5-13 and Luke 7:1-10, Jesus heals a centurion's servant who is dying. According to James Neill, the Greek term "pais" used for the servant almost always had a sexual connotation. According to Daniel A. Helminiak, it only "sometimes" was given this meaning. Donald Wold states that its normal meaning is "boy", "child" or "slave" and its application to a boy lover escapes notice in the standard lexica of Liddell and Scott and the Bauer lexicon. In her detailed study of the episode in Matthew and Luke, Wendy Cotter dismisses as very unlikely the idea that the use of the Greek word "pais" indicated a sexual relationship between the centurion and the young slave. Neill himself compares the meanings of Greek "pais" to those of French "garçon", which, though also used to mean "waiter", "most commonly means 'boy'". In support of his view that Greek "pais" on the contrary most often means a young male lover, he says that it is "the" root of the English word "pederasty", while at the same time indicating that the English word is derived also from Greek "erasthai" (to love). He sees in the fact that the boy is described as "valued highly" by the centurion an indication of a homosexual relationship between the two, and says that the Greek word "doulos" (a slave) used of him in Luke's account of the episode suggests he may have been a sex slave. Others interpret "pais" merely as a boy servant, not a male lover, and read nothing sexual into "valued highly".

Matthew 19:12

In Matthew 19:12, Jesus speaks of eunuchs who were born as such, eunuchs who were made so by others, and eunuchs who choose to live as such for the kingdom of heaven. This passage has been interpreted as having to do with homosexual orientation; Clement of Alexandria, for instance, wrote in his commentary on it that some men, from birth, are naturally averse to women and should not marry.

Acts 8

Main article: Ethiopian eunuch

The Ethiopian eunuch, an early gentile convert encountered in Acts 8, has been described as an early gay Christian, based on the fact that the word "eunuch" in the Bible was not always used literally, as in Matthew 19:12. Commentators generally suggest that the combination of "eunuch" together with the title "court official" indicates a literal eunuch - not a homosexual - who would have been excluded from the Temple by the restriction in Deuteronomy 23:1.

See also

References

  1. Religion Dispatches magazine, Candace Chellew-Hodge
  2. "Leviticus 18 (New International Version)". Retrieved 16 February 2013.
  3. "Leviticus 20 (New International Version)". Retrieved 16 February 2013.
  4. [Jeffrey S. Siker, Homosexuality and Religion (Greenwood Publishing Group 2007 ISBN 978-0-31333088-9), p. 67
  5. John Gill, Lev. 18:22
  6. ^ Crompton, Louis (2006). Homosexuality & Civilization. Harvard University Press. p. 37-39.
  7. ^ [http://books.google.com/books?id=o2axakq56X4C&pg=PT61&dq=Gagnon+"particularly+abominable"&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_8gxUa_pA8WThgfmr4HgDA&redir_esc=y Robert A. Gagnon, The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics (Abingdon Press 2010 ISBN 978-1-42673078-8)
  8. "Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  9. Ezekiel 16:49-50 (KJV)
  10. Matthew 10:14-15
  11. James B. DeYoung, Homosexuality: Contemporary Claims Examined in Light of the Bible and Other Ancient Literature and Law (Kregel Academic 2000 ISBN 978-0-82549588-5), p. 44
  12. ^ David F. Greenberg, The Construction of Homosexuality (University of Chicago Press 1990 ISBN 978-0-22630628-5), p. 201
  13. Jude 1:7
  14. J. Harold Ellins, Sex in the Bible (Greenwood Publishing 2006 ISBN 0-275-98767-1), p. 117
  15. Boswell, John. Same-sex Unions in Premodern Europe. New York: Vintage, 1994. (pp. 135–137)
  16. Halperin, David M. One Hundred Years of Homosexuality. New York: Routledge, 1990. (p. 83)
  17. Soliciting Interpretation
  18. "Romans 1 (New International Version)". Retrieved 16 February 2013.
  19. Interpretations of Romans 1:26-27 by Religious Liberals, Religious Tolerance
  20. Mark Hertzog (1996). The lavender vote: Lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in American electoral politics. NYU Press. p. 58. ISBN 0-8147-3530-4.
  21. http://bible.org/article/homosexuality-christian-perspective Homosexuality: The Christian Perspective
  22. http://www.catholic.com/library/Homosexuality.asp
  23. http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_eccdc.htm THE EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH AND HOMOSEXUALITY
  24. http://www.holy-trinity.org/morality/homosexuality.html Orthodox Statement on Homosexuality
  25. Mentioning the Unmentionable. Nelson, Eugene Jr. (Rev.), 12 Oct 1997, Community Church of Sebastopol
  26. Romans: Exposing The Lie That Paul Condemns Homosexuality
  27. Romans 1: Read the Whole Chapter Kiddo. Cadonau-Huseby, Anita
  28. Way, Ron (13 May 2011). "The Bible and homosexuality: Selectively plucking passages looks like seeking divine cover for denying basic human rights". MinnPost. Retrieved 14 May 2011.
  29. Rogers, Jack (2009). Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church. ISBN 978-0-664-23397-6. Retrieved 14 May 2011.
  30. Farrell, Ph.D. (Rev.), John T. "On Biblical Authority". Retrieved 14 May 2011.
  31. Cauthen, Kenneth. "Homosexuality and Religion". Retrieved 14 May 2011.
  32. White (Rev.), Mel. "What the Bible Says - And Doesn't Say - About Homosexuality". Retrieved 14 May 2011.
  33. "1 Corinthians 6 (New International Version)". Retrieved 16 February 2013.
  34. Russell Pregeant (2008). Stefan Koenemann & Ronald A. Jenner (ed.). Knowing truth, doing good: engaging New Testament ethics. Fortress Press. p. 252. ISBN 978-0-8006-3846-7.
  35. "1 Timothy 1 (New International Version)". Retrieved 16 February 2013.
  36. Boswell, John (1981). Christianity, social tolerance, and homosexuality: gay people in Western Europe from the beginning of the Christian era to the fourteenth century. University of Chicago Press. p. 364. ISBN 978-0-226-06711-7.
  37. Scroggs, Robin (1983). The New Testament and homosexuality: contextual background for contemporary debate. Fortress Press. pp. 62–65, 106–109. ISBN 978-0-8006-1854-4.
  38. Berlinerblau, Jacques (2005). The secular Bible: why nonbelievers must take religion seriously. Cambridge University Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-521-85314-9.
  39. The Greek-English Lexicon of Liddell and Scott registers three meanings of the word παῖς (pais): a child in relation to descent (son or daughter); a child in relation to age (boy or girl); a slave or servant (male or female). In this case the word is accompanied by the masculine article.
  40. ^ Neill, James (2009). The Origins and Role of Same-Sex Relations In Human Societies. McFarland. p. 216.
  41. Daniel A. Helminiak, Sex and the Sacred (Routledge 2012 ISBN 978-1-13657075-9), p. 192
  42. Stephen D. Moore, God's Beauty Parlor Stanford University Press 2001 ISBN 978-0-80474332-7), p. 257
  43. Wendy Cotter, The Christ of the Miracle Stories (Baker Academic 2010 ISBN 978-0-80103950-8), p. 125
  44. Luke 7:1
  45. Matthew 19:12
  46. "Those who are naturally so constituted do well not to marry."
  47. McNeill, John J. (2010). Freedom, Glorious Freedom: The Spiritual Journey to the Fullness of Life for Gays, Lesbians, and Everybody Else. Lethe. p. 211.
  48. McNeill, John J. (1993). The Church and the homosexual (4 ed.). Beacon Press. pp. 63–65.
  49. MacArthur, John (1994). Newstament Commentary, Volume 6: Acts 1-12. Moody. p. 254. ISBN 0-8024-0759-5.
  50. Johnson, Luke T.; Harrington, Daniel J. (1992). The Acts of the Apostles. Liturgical Press. p. 155. ISBN 0-8146-5807-5.

Literature

Religion and LGBT people
Overview
Religions
Christianity
Other Abrahamic
Indian
Other
Related pages

Categories: