Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carptrash (talk | contribs) at 15:02, 4 May 2013 (→A friendly suggestion: a few questions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Rgambord. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- # _ 01:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Male privilege and its relation to Men's rights movement

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- # _ 04:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

A friendly suggestion

You may want to read up a bit on ArbCom before throwing your proverbial hat into the ring. You are of course welcome to do so either way.

The only reason I placed notifications here on your talk page is because I mentioned your name in the two noticeboard filings I made, at NPOVN and ANI. I am required to place those notices by mentioning your name on these noticeboards, despite the fact that these issues are, or at least were, historical and by what I interpret most administrators' standards to be, stale.

I am not telling you what to do or how to go about your business, but simply suggesting that it may be worth your while to read up about what you appear to want to get involved in. -- # _ 08:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

You're not doing much to impress me upon your return. I had hoped for some community action, not more strife. In the time I've spent responding to your various noticeboard posts, and the time you spent crafting them, you and I could have easily fleshed out Male Privilege. Instead, it sits in a most disagreeable state. So it goes. Rgambord (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

In my experience, and of course yours may be different, editing is not nearly so easy. One of the first articles I worked on is Aspirin. I only worked on the medical section. I started last summer, intending it simply as a review of the published evidence and WP content, hoping to comply with WP:MEDRS and ideally, use Open Access articles as much as possible.

I am still not finished, nearly a year later. -- # _ 10:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

I spend most of my time translating articles on the renaissance from it.wikipedia.org. I hate humanities for all the division that comes up. Due to your civility, I will be redacting my statements on your edit warring. Personally, I think Apostle12 needs to find new subject matter because he just doesn't get it, even though I don't think he's necessarily malicious. He reminds me of a regular on craigslist forums named Pat, who most people assume is a troll, but is just a confused and bitter old man. Pending my ban appeal, I am more than happy to work with you on Male Privilege. Recall, I came to that page curious as to what male privilege was, what examples could be provided, and also who had argued against it. I am neither a feminist nor an MRA. I am just a guy who tries to understand the world a little bit more every day. From my point of view, males and females each enjoy certain privileges at different times and in different places in society. The two concepts are not mutually exclusive, and one can't really be said to have objectively more privilege than another, because how could one compare privileges? For example, some see women not being expected to work as a privilege, while others see men's ability to support themselves economically as privilege. Two sides. I want to show both. My goal is not to influence people's opinions, but to give them the information needed to draw their own. However, that's my personal opinion, not relevant to the article since it's all OR, but might help to better bridge the gap between our respective vision for the article, no? Rgambord (talk) 10:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

I came here, drawn in by the statement on your user page, wondering why anyone feeling that way would take part in such an experiment, and then discovered this phrase:

"For example, some see women not being expected to work as a privilege"

and I found myself wondering, "What women is he (you call yourself a "guy") referring to who do not work and whose expectations is he talking about?" Will you clarify these for me? Carptrash (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Undo

You need to self-revert here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 09:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Appeal of article ban

You need to go to WP:Arbitration enforcement to appeal the article ban you're currently under. They have instructions there for appeals. AniMate 10:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

If you have anything to weigh in on it, . Else, thank you!

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Accusations and personal attacks

Should you repeat your claims that I accused you of vandalism and that I attacked you or that I have an axe to grind , I'll have no other choice than to take you to AN/I again.

Just so that we are clear: You didn't just merge sections, you also deleted sections and removed comments that I had to restore or changed other editors' comments without first consulting the patrolling admins.

Furthermore, Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation#Remedy states that any editor may be sanctioned by an uninvolved administrator for disruptive edits, including, but not limited to, edit warring, personal attacks, incivility and assumptions of bad faith. I made an ANI thread about your personal attacks against editors involved in the men's rights movement article including "Are you dense? (That's a rhetorical question, don't answer it.)" and "you should be ashamed of yourself. People like you disgust me." Other instances of personal attacks and/or incivility on April 23 include in addition to assumptions of bad faith . --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Your behavior is moving into harassment territory. You have repeatedly butted in with your quips and opinions about me. You have been the greatest advocate against me EVERYWHERE YOU HAVE APPEARED. Your axe must be getting mighty sharp by now. Do you think that other PEOPLE would respond happily to your condescending tone? Especially when you're just plain wrong about what you're saying? Apparently you think anything I say to you is an insult, so I have nothing more to say. Leave me alone. Rgambord (talk) 13:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)