This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) at 06:46, 31 May 2013 (Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 15d) to Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ/Archive 2.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:46, 31 May 2013 by MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) (Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 15d) to Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ/Archive 2.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
RE: Calling "attention to the problem publicly"
As described at Misplaced Pages:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Dealing_with_biased_contributors. When I see something like this it means to me the first step is: discuss at the talk page per WP:Dispute, start a new section on biased editing, quote the policy and then list strong evidence, especially quoting very biased WP:Soapbox by individual(s). Obviously as politely as possible (which I intend to do next time) - but if I am totally misinterpreting this, do tell. First time I tried it a new editor who sees every correction as a personal attack went postal so of course it makes me a bit nervous in doing it again. Thanks. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 15:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)