This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NovaSkola (talk | contribs) at 00:13, 4 June 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:13, 4 June 2013 by NovaSkola (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archives |
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIDE Grand Prix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, NovaSkola. You have new messages at Acroterion's talk page.Message added 02:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Acroterion (talk) 02:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Ibad
I posted a sourced statement which proves what you said is false and you reject it (i post an interview with an Azerbaijani general who fought in the war and you post from a propaganda movie), i leave your statement and add mine and you still delete mine, i post pictures from an Azerbaijani source and you claim its not proof. Stop with your vandalism, just because you want to believe he killed Monte doesnt make it true. Ninetoyadome (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninetoyadome (talk • contribs) 01:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Good article reassessment.
Hi there. I noticed that you recently nominated Azerbaijan Premier League and Neftchi Baku PFC for Good article reassessment. As this is something that it used for current good articles, and neither of those are listed as GA's at the moment, I believe that you wanted to nominate it for Good article nomination? If that is correct, you should remove the GAR-template at the talkpages and follow WP:GAN/I for instructions on how to nominate these articles for GAN. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
I have warned you on my talk page
Just to let you know. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement discretionary sanction: Armenia-Azerbaijan topic ban
The following sanction now applies to you (in accordance with the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions):
You are topic-banned (WP:TBAN) from everything related to Armenia or Azerbaijan for six months.
You have been sanctioned for the reason(s) set down in this Arbitration Enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. This sanction has been recorded on the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a topic ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeal. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal. If you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Sandstein 06:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating your Armenia / Azerbaijan topic ban with your edits of 2 June 2013 about Azerbaijani football, you have been blocked from editing for 48 hours. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Sandstein 06:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.
This user is asking that his block be reviewed:
NovaSkola (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I've been user in Misplaced Pages long time ago, made over 20,000 contributions and never been given topic ban on Azerbaijani-Armenia relations few days ago by Sandstein. However, I think this ban is unfair as someone violated my IP and wrote some nonsense and as a result I've been unfairly blocked. Furthermore, looks like nobody given my account three-revert rule blocks I've demand to unblock me on charges of that 99% of my edits been trouble free, I've understand that in future I've take responsibility from my account as well as I will follow Misplaced Pages's guideline to make better community. --NovaSkola (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, I've been user in Misplaced Pages long time ago, made over 20,000 contributions and never been given topic ban on Azerbaijani-Armenia relations few days ago by Sandstein. However, I think this ban is unfair as someone violated my IP and wrote some nonsense and as a result I've been unfairly blocked. Furthermore, looks like nobody given my account three-revert rule blocks I've demand to unblock me on charges of that 99% of my edits been trouble free, I've understand that in future I've take responsibility from my account as well as I will follow Misplaced Pages's guideline to make better community. --] (]) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I've been user in Misplaced Pages long time ago, made over 20,000 contributions and never been given topic ban on Azerbaijani-Armenia relations few days ago by Sandstein. However, I think this ban is unfair as someone violated my IP and wrote some nonsense and as a result I've been unfairly blocked. Furthermore, looks like nobody given my account three-revert rule blocks I've demand to unblock me on charges of that 99% of my edits been trouble free, I've understand that in future I've take responsibility from my account as well as I will follow Misplaced Pages's guideline to make better community. --] (]) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I've been user in Misplaced Pages long time ago, made over 20,000 contributions and never been given topic ban on Azerbaijani-Armenia relations few days ago by Sandstein. However, I think this ban is unfair as someone violated my IP and wrote some nonsense and as a result I've been unfairly blocked. Furthermore, looks like nobody given my account three-revert rule blocks I've demand to unblock me on charges of that 99% of my edits been trouble free, I've understand that in future I've take responsibility from my account as well as I will follow Misplaced Pages's guideline to make better community. --] (]) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Arbitration enforcement action appeal by NovaSkola
Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.
To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).
- Appealing user
- NovaSkola (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – NovaSkola (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sanction being appealed
- 6 month topic ban from the subject of Azerbaijan-Armenia relations, imposed at few days ago
- Administrator imposing the sanction
- Sandstein (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Notification of that administrator
- The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.
Statement by NovaSkola
Hello, I've been user in Misplaced Pages long time ago, made over 20,000 contributions and never been given topic ban until few days ago, someone violated my IP and wrote some nonsense and as a result I've been topic banned for editing Azerbaijan-Armenia related articles, even though it wasn't completely my fault. Furthermore, looks like nobody given my account three-revert rule blocks
I've demand to unblock me on charges of that 99% of my edits been trouble free, I've understand that in future I've take responsibility from my account as well as I will follow Misplaced Pages's guideline to make better community. --NovaSkola (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Statement by Sandstein
Statement by (involved editor 1)
Statement by (involved editor 2)
Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by NovaSkola
Result of the appeal by NovaSkola
- This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.