This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FT2 (talk | contribs) at 13:37, 22 July 2007 (Evidence length). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:37, 22 July 2007 by FT2 (talk | contribs) (Evidence length)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Based on our experience at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/HistoryBuffEr and Jayjg/Evidence, a thoughouly confusing page, I have made a change in format requiring that each person who enters evidence present evidence in their own section only. Fred Bauder 15:20, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
- I agree wholeheartedly. →Raul654 20:42, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
Link change
I changed the link to the workshop to ] because when you open cases you won't have to fix the links manually. If there's something wrong with this, please let me know and revert. Johnleemk | Talk 09:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
It would please me greatly
It would please me greatly if this template did not use my name as an example. Cute, but... :-)--Jimbo Wales 20:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Evidence length
Updated to reflect two points arising in Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Attachment Therapy:
- Length is mostly for the primary evidence, responses should be kept short as well, but are not necessarily part of the "rule of thumb" 1000 words/100 diffs. Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Attachment Therapy/Evidence#Evidence Presentations
- Clerk judgement on reasonable evidence length/layout may apply on cases with unusual complexity. comment clerk opinion