This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) at 06:47, 11 September 2013 (Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 15d) to Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ/Archive 2.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:47, 11 September 2013 by MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) (Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 15d) to Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ/Archive 2.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
These horses go only one way
I have removed the bit from WP:NECESSARY suggesting that it would be appropriate to mention Creationism in an article Evolution of the horse. That article makes no such mention, correctly sussing out that it would be off topic, and we should anyway not be dictating content from a policy page. Our articles on similar topics, from Human evolution to Phylogeny of insects right down to Galaxy formation and evolution, likewise do not consider it an appropriate part of their respective topics. We might replace the text with something differentiating articles discussing the process itself from articles about the development or the social impact of the theory, but the section seems to stand fine without it. - 2/0 (cont.) 10:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)