Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Bill O'Reilly controversies - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hateless (talk | contribs) at 18:45, 12 June 2006 ([]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:45, 12 June 2006 by Hateless (talk | contribs) ([])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Bill O'Reilly controversies

The page is inherently unencyclopedic, containing incidents that can easily be incorporated into the Bill O'Reilly main page. Stanley011 18:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep, at 51k and with 20 or so footnotes, the article can NOT be easily incorporated into the main article. The article seems well-sourced but there are NPOV issues which warrant editing, and perhaps a few sections should be removed, but I don't see anything non-encyclopedic about it, esp. for a non-paper encyclopedia like WP is. hateless 18:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)