Misplaced Pages

:Peer review/Neo-Renaissance/archive1 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Peer review | Neo-Renaissance

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joelr31 (talk | contribs) at 03:26, 17 June 2006 (→[]: re: minor fixes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:26, 17 June 2006 by Joelr31 (talk | contribs) (→[]: re: minor fixes)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Neo-Renaissance

Good article which the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Architecture would like to see improved.--Mcginnly 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

  • The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.
  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
  • Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
This has been fixed thanks to bobblewik's tool. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18&nbsp;mm.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.
Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • correctly
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already too, please strike this comment).
  • As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah . to blah blah.