Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Intuitive2000 (talk | contribs) at 16:43, 24 March 2014 (→We are not Ouadfeul mouthpiece). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Academic Journals Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Ouadfeul (talk · contribs) / Pattern Recognition in Physics This user has contributed to the article.

We are not Ouadfeul mouthpiece

We are not here to re-trumpet Ouadfeul's complaints about how he-was-so-terribly-mistreated-and-see-how-those-climate-change-guys-gang-up-on-us-skeptics. If third party reliable sources comment on the issue, we can cover it. If not and its just more self-serving self published claims that we do not use or blabber from the blog-o-sphere, then we don't cover it. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

• I completely agree with this assessment. --Randykitty (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

As do I. I'd like to add that Jo Nova and Tallbloke aren't reliable sources and therefore shouldn't be used to justify inclusion of this stuff either. @Intuitive2000:, will you please discuss your edits instead of edit-warring incessantly, unless you want to get blocked? Jinkinson talk to me 16:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

We are here to tell the full story about this journal, not just part of it to favor somebody. The original post was very unbalanced in favor of Copernicus arguments for closing the journal. I added the official reply from Morner which has been published. The opinion of Jo Nova and Tallbloke are as reliable as those of Jeffrey Beall. You are censoring for political reasoning.

• Stub-Class Academic Journal articles
• WikiProject Academic Journal articles
• Articles edited by connected contributors