This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andrew Parodi (talk | contribs) at 03:38, 26 June 2006 (→People That Do not Know how to read will start there messages below, WATCH! :)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:38, 26 June 2006 by Andrew Parodi (talk | contribs) (→People That Do not Know how to read will start there messages below, WATCH! :))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Place NEW Messages near the TOP of this file. Older Messages will be near the bottom. Thanks! :)
Housemates Table and Original Research
Please see the talk page of BB06 to discuss the use of the housemates table in the article -- CHANLORD / 
02:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
The helpme request
In case someone asks in the future, I finally found the list of currently activated extensions. (Located here). Thanks for responding to my request.--SomeStranger 12:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Archives
People That Do not Know how to read will start there messages below, WATCH! :)
(And people who do not know how to spell will use the word "there" when they really mean to use the word "their," WATCH!)
Authorship of A Course In Miracles article
I'll be brief. I am not posting on the talk page anymore because there is a great deal of arguing there that I am not interested in.
I posted to your talk page because you are the only one who has voiced the concern that the article is not important.
I'm not going back to the talk page of that article because it's too ugly. If you want to talk about it, we'll have to do it via our respective talk pages. -- Andrew Parodi 03:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- PS: Regarding your suggestion that I have an "attachment" to that article, I actually have an attachment to everything I write. I can't imagine writing something that I don't have attachment to. You have no more right to tell me not to have attachments to what I write than I do to tell you to HAVE attachments to what you write. To each his own. -- Andrew Parodi 03:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ste4k wrote: I am going to ignore you on my talk page now. I consider your attitude harrassing. Thanks.
- PS: Regarding your suggestion that I have an "attachment" to that article, I actually have an attachment to everything I write. I can't imagine writing something that I don't have attachment to. You have no more right to tell me not to have attachments to what I write than I do to tell you to HAVE attachments to what you write. To each his own. -- Andrew Parodi 03:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'll get some "ice" and "chill off" the same point when you get a life and chill off.
- I have no understanding of why you make such objective statements about articles about whose content you demonstrate no objective understanding.
- The fact that you are only one contesting the "importance" of the article is "sourced" in the article's talk page. The arbitrator of that article, a completely neutral person, even referred to your contesting of the article's importance as "nonsense."
- As for the accusation of "harrassment," funny. You have had an arrogant and condescending attitude with that article all the way through, not just to me but the other editors. Oh, and that statement is sourced by reading the talk page of the article in question. -- Andrew Parodi 03:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)