This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Konstable (talk | contribs) at 13:42, 27 June 2006 (→[]: keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:42, 27 June 2006 by Konstable (talk | contribs) (→[]: keep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Gary Renard
Topic matter is unverifiable having no reliable published source per Item 6.3. This slightly appears to be a vanity page used to support a book which hasn't received multiple awards. Without references the article is original research at best, and it does not establish any sort of notability that can be referenced about this author. Ste4k 07:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Err, the guy's book's sales rank on Amazon is 1,313, which is pretty hefty; there's nothing in WP:BIO that requires books to win multiple awards for their authors to be notable. I agree that the article needs considerable cleanup to be worth much as biography (heck, his Amazon profile has more bio info), but this certainly clears the WP:BIO bar and by a good bit. RGTraynor 08:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep, appears to be at least marginally notable per WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk 08:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)- Delete. After double-checking, seems to fail WP:BIO - only 429 unique Google hits, and no mentions in any notable media. --Coredesat talk 09:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and Clean-up. RGTraynor is right that the book's sales rank alone makes the author notable. Defeinitely a notable figure in the A Course in Miracles universe/cult/religion. Article just needs prose improvement. --Nscheffey 11:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Amazon.com sales rank.--Konstable 13:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)