This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HBC AIV helperbot11 (talk | contribs) at 18:16, 29 June 2014 (1 IP & 4 users left. rm 98.215.182.49 (blocked indef by Bbb23 (AO ABD)).). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:16, 29 June 2014 by HBC AIV helperbot11 (talk | contribs) (1 IP & 4 users left. rm 98.215.182.49 (blocked indef by Bbb23 (AO ABD)).)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) "WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles and content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 09:12 on 27 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
Bot-reported
User-reported
- Jerrod0926 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – User continues to make disruptive edits to several soap articles, despite warnings to stop. livelikemusic 01:47, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Question: Sort of hard to tell what's genuinely wrong. Can you post a diff of a post-final warning disruptive edit? Daniel Case (talk) 14:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Rajandran (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – – vandalism, including, including 1, 2 – —MelbourneStar☆ 08:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. This seems like an effectively new user who may not understand how we do things yet. And, he hasn't edited for five hours as of this writing. Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Shailendra1973 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On ]: account is being used only for promotional purposes. Account has created an autobiographical page and is repeatedly removing speedy templates from it. Amortias (T)(C) 17:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Note: The page has been deleted, perhaps we can wait and see if the user continues to be disruptive. Perhaps they will take head of out auto-biography rules. Any further attempts to promote themselves should result in a block though. Chillum 17:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- 162.197.176.138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Persistent vandalism by IP. Multiple warnings given. Request 2 weeks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 17:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Stale warning. Last warning was issued 5 days ago. This IP has not been warned since the 24th, it may not even be the same person. These may be test edits. Chillum 17:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Warned user. I have given the user a level 1 test warning and will keep the talk page on my watchlist. Chillum 17:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Chillum: May not even be the same person? If not then it's someone else who by a remarkable chance edits the same articles from the same IP address and makes very similar edits.The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Granted it is likely the same person. However it is only a couple edits over 5 days, I don't see a block as preventative at this point. I will however consider this user fully warned if they resume in the near future.
- I have absolutely no objection if another admin wants to handle this differently. Chillum 18:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- TrichomeGOLD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Taylor Gang Records (diff):. Adding unsourced content after a final warning. STATic message me! 17:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)