Misplaced Pages

Template:Did you know nominations/Paco Campos

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Template:Did you know nominations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yoninah (talk | contribs) at 21:57, 23 July 2014 (r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:57, 23 July 2014 by Yoninah (talk | contribs) (r)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
DYK toolbox

Paco Campos

( )

Created by The Almightey Drill (talk). Self nominated at 15:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC).

  • @The Almightey Drill: New enough and long enough, meets core content policies mostly. Honors section is unreferenced. AGF Spanish sources. --Jakob (talk) 23:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • OK, good. --Jakob (talk) 01:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • The QPQ review is incomplete. Yoninah (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • No, it isn't. It's just been disputed; that's different. --Jakob (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry, "Interesting hook with a source. Valid date." is not a valid DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • What's the point of going so far as to demand this? There's no proof everything wasn't checked, just like there's no proof everything was checked if somebody writes a thousand words explaining how they checked and spotchecked everything. --Jakob (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Oh, please. It's a simple matter of writing one line with the things you checked. As the DYK rules say: Please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed; your comment should look something like the following:

    Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened.

    Obviously, this reviewer only checked the hook fact and the article creation date. That leaves article length, adequate sourcing, hook cited inline, close paraphrasing, and proper footnote style for the prep promoter and the queue administrator to check. We're trying to increase accountability at the reviewer level. Yoninah (talk) 21:57, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Category: