This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fayenatic london (talk | contribs) at 13:47, 7 August 2014 (→Category:LGBT_Roman_Catholics: Closer's comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:47, 7 August 2014 by Fayenatic london (talk | contribs) (→Category:LGBT_Roman_Catholics: Closer's comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) < 2014 August 6 Deletion review archives: 2014 August 2014 August 8 >7 August 2014
Gang stalking
With sites like Ask.fm being in the news, and multiple new sources coming to light about alleged "Internet trolling" really being gang stalking, this article should be undeleted, and should not redirect to Stalking. It's protected, so I can't edit it, and we should put this back up at AfD. It is clearly notable. Homeontherange (talk) 11:19, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Dating Reality and Things
This page should not have been speedily-deleted; sources were provided, and it should have been taken to AFD. It was very clearly not CSD A7 or G11, and notability criteria is met. Homeontherange (talk) 11:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Endorse, textbook A7. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Category:LGBT_Roman_Catholics
The majority opinion was not to delete. Two editors supported deletion; three editors opposed deletion; one editor called for a review of each article; one editor suggested a purge of articles not directly including LGBT material.Contaldo80 (talk) 10:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Closer's comment: it was my view that those arguing for deletion made stronger arguments on policy grounds. The contents are biographies and for the living subjects WP:BLP issues are clearly important. It was accepted that the inclusion of various dead members was also debatable. Purging the category would only address these issues at one point in time, leaving exposure to future abuse of the category. A list is a far better place for this information as grounds for inclusion can be explicitly stated, cited and discussed. A list can also be much more informative, with sections or table columns for historical period, occupation etc. I left a link to the diffs, in order to facilitate creating such a list. – Fayenatic London 13:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)