This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 01:14, 2 September 2014 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive 3) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:14, 2 September 2014 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive 3) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
RE: reverting Jason Narvy
Hey, instead of taking the easy way out and reverting my edit, why don't you contribute to the community by Googling around and citing a source yourself, you laggard ineffectual douchebag? Here, I'll make your job even easier and paste the source right here: http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/
Re:hanging editor's comment
What the heck, when you are right, you are right. Tony the Marine (talk)
Re: Notability of Fatimah Busu
Thank you for your interest in the article on Fatimah Busu. By re-reverting you are engaging in an edit war, and could be temporarily blocked from editing by continuing to do so.
An article's talk page is the appropriate place to air concerns about the article. This article meets the basic notability guidelines as well as additional ones for authors and academics — there are two major references, independently published by academic publishers. She is the most prominent author in the Malay language, and I shall add that cited information to the lead of the article for clarity. Please, in future, engage in conversation with other users instead of reverting their work. — Gareth Hughes (talk) 16:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Garzo:, I guess you were the one to revert the tag-addition (while failing to address the problems raised by the tag). Please, consider removing the tag only when you add to the lead of the article that the she is "the most prominent author in the Malay language". But please, use reliable references or you'll be reverted. That's a BLP and you don't have a choice.--damiens.rf 17:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- The tag was reverted because the author is notable and the article meets those guidelines. Re-reverting is engaging in an edit war, and is not acceptable. I have added another major source to the article, and filled out the lead paragraph. If you feel there are further problems, you should use the article's talk page to air them. — Gareth Hughes (talk) 17:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Top Banana
You stop reverting it. And it's not "your work", wikipedia is a community collaboration. You just want to get into an edit war.Top Banana the group is more notable than the guesthouse listed there and which you do not mind having. Antonio Camilo Martin (dime aca) 05;42, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
Asimov short story "Reason" Revertion, Why?
Hello there. I'm new to Misplaced Pages, but feel the Article could be improved by providing some ideas regarding interpretation. can you please explain why you reverted my contribution. Thank you.