Misplaced Pages

User talk:AmritasyaPutra

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AmritasyaPutra (talk | contribs) at 17:39, 14 September 2014 (→September 2014). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:39, 14 September 2014 by AmritasyaPutra (talk | contribs) (→September 2014)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Re:Edit on Hindutva page

Thank you for the update and the edit. DebashisM 13:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you very much for the barnstar! I'm really happy that my interference is appreciated. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:AmritasyaPutra reported by User:Vanamonde93 (Result: ). Thank you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Vidya Bharati. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   Wifione 17:26, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

AmritasyaPutra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. The content was reinserted before I was blocked and I did not revert, I do not intend to either. It is present in the article. 2. Talk page discussion is 2h old, I was discussing there, please check. 3. The other editor reverted 3 times. And the person reporting me to ANI put it back 4th time before reporting. I had requested page protection against edit war much before this, This is my first 3RR violation, will not repeat. Thank you.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=1. The content was reinserted before I was blocked and I did not revert, I do not intend to either. It is present in the article. 2. Talk page discussion is 2h old, I was discussing there, please check. 3. The other editor reverted 3 times. And the person reporting me to ANI put it back 4th time before reporting. I had requested page protection against edit war much before this, This is my first 3RR violation, will not repeat. Thank you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=1. The content was reinserted before I was blocked and I did not revert, I do not intend to either. It is present in the article. 2. Talk page discussion is 2h old, I was discussing there, please check. 3. The other editor reverted 3 times. And the person reporting me to ANI put it back 4th time before reporting. I had requested page protection against edit war much before this, This is my first 3RR violation, will not repeat. Thank you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=1. The content was reinserted before I was blocked and I did not revert, I do not intend to either. It is present in the article. 2. Talk page discussion is 2h old, I was discussing there, please check. 3. The other editor reverted 3 times. And the person reporting me to ANI put it back 4th time before reporting. I had requested page protection against edit war much before this, This is my first 3RR violation, will not repeat. Thank you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: