User talk:RoyBoy - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 06:20, 16 January 2015 (→Your [] nomination of []: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:20, 16 January 2015 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (→Your [] nomination of []: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

24 December 2024

News and notes: Responsibilities and liabilities as a "Very Large Online Platform"

Op-ed: Beeblebrox on Wikipediocracy, the Committee, and everything

Opinion: Graham87 on being the first-ever administrator recall subject

In the media: Delhi High Court considers Caravan and Ken for evaluating the ANI vs. WMF case

From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting?

Recent research: "Misplaced Pages editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality

Humour: Backlash over Santa Claus' Misplaced Pages article intensifies

Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols

Traffic report: Was a long and dark December

Single page

RoyBoy Archives
2004 New user, Abortion, BR, Amorrow 2005 New admin, RC Patrol Barnstar, RfA's 2005 Signpost, BRION, WikiWatch, Monobook 2006 Gastrich, Anon blocks, Feat&Admin 2007 Images, evolution, private island, ABC GA 2008 ABC med, BR, awards, abort, colon 2009 Orphan img, AfD 2010 Evo, MedCom, Fair use, NovSci 2011 BR FAR, Talk:Abortion, Top1% img 2012-14 FfD's, Infanticide, Gspot, Trust, but verify

This user is a
Cabal of One.

What the heck is this gonna do? RoyBoy 05:03, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Trust, but verify

Trust, but verify is old (but still solid) advice. Just a light-hearted link to a quirky little article. - 2/0 (cont.) 18:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again, wow that was messed up. Did we just post to each other's talk pages in the same minute about different things? Freaky. - Roy Boy 18:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Looks like it. Certainly I got your notice by saving this page and got a laugh when I saw who was pinging me. Happy editing. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Abortion: "Art, literature and film"

Since going back in the history files I see that you were the one who created this section of the abortion article, I thought I'd make sure that you know (what you probably already know) that it was recently removed from the article. There was a discussion about it on the article's Talk page at "Anne Sexton/Don't be buffaloed." KatieHepPal (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abortion

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Abortion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AlanZhu314159265358979 -- AlanZhu314159265358979 (talk) 06:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)