Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Proposed decision

< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | GamerGate

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guerillero (talk | contribs) at 18:01, 1 February 2015 (blank). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:01, 1 February 2015 by Guerillero (talk | contribs) (blank)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched

To request an amendment or clarification of an Arbitration decision, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
To report a violation of an Arbitration decision, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.
To request the assistance of an arbitration clerk, see Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks.

Shortcut

WP:ARBGG

Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerks: Ks0stm (Talk) & Sphilbrick (Talk) Drafting arbitrators: Roger Davies (Talk) & Beeblebrox (Talk)

Misplaced Pages Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

Archives

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.