Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Crzrussian (talk | contribs) at 05:07, 23 July 2006 (→[]: close, delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - CrazyRussian talk/email 05:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Psychotronics

Psychotronics was nominated for deletion on 2004-12-31. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Psychotronics.

IMHO, cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article -- Writtenonsand 23:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete appears to be a longstanding but non-mainstream newage neologism with no real fixed meaning. I'd be for keeping it if it were fixed or a menaing could be nailed down, but like the niminator I doubt that it's possible. Artw
• Keep based on previous vote for keep, even if only for historical reasons Antares33712 14:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It needs watching to keep people from turning it into a promotion of the ideas involved, but I don't agree that it cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: this doesn't seem to be an encyclopaedic. Byrgenwulf 17:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a jumble of uncoordinated ideas with vanishingly small encyclopaedic content. Anville 18:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.