This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jb 007clone (talk | contribs) at 22:09, 15 February 2015 (→The Kingsman). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:09, 15 February 2015 by Jb 007clone (talk | contribs) (→The Kingsman)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The Kingsman
Update: Damn, it feels so good to be vindicated :) Jb 007clone (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
A friendly warning that you have reached your 3 revert limit for The Kingsman article. Please maintain the discussion on the talk page instead of continuing the edit war. If the consensus is to add the gag, then it can be added back to the article. It won't hurt the page with it gone for the time being. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Do I have a choice otherwise? Jb 007clone (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- You have multiple choices. You've initially chosen to engage in an edit war (as did the other editor, and I warned them as well). You can choose to stay on the talk page, with the page reverted back to its original state, until a consensus is arrived at. Or, you could choose to engage in the edit war some more, and risk being blocked. I hope it's the former and not the latter though. As the latter means you cannot continue to discuss your reasoning for including the gag in the article until the block is up. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- So the choice is talk page or blocked? Doesn't seem like much of a 'choice', does it? Don't worry, I won't revert the page anymore. Jb 007clone (talk) 19:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)