This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joehazelton (talk | contribs) at 05:23, 26 July 2006 (A plea for help). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:23, 26 July 2006 by Joehazelton (talk | contribs) (A plea for help)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Joehazelton (talk) on Peter Roskam (NEW)
Brief: It is my humble opinon that the recent editing on this page is very bias. Futher more, one of the active editors also edits on the Tammy Duckworth pages as well and is less agressive in adding negative spin on that page vers on Roskams page. Both Roskam and Duckworh are now running for Nov 2006 for this hotly contested seat for the Illinois 6th house distict. My edits get wiped with mumbo jumbo and theats to me. I can read and guys are spinning on this article in a negative way. There is a wiki admin, a self described Democrat, over see this right now. I need help with the wiki process to make sure this article is truly NPOV which, in my humble opinon is not right now. thanks (read full description) -- Joehazelton 05:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Tychocat (talk) on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Brown (NEW)
Brief: The discussion has been vandalized to remove all "delete" nominations. This is so far out of my experience I have no idea what to do with it. (read full description) -- Tychocat 04:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Kickstart70 (talk) on Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Samuel_Luo and Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Essjay_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29_block_of_CovenantD_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29 (NEW)
Brief: User:CovenantD was blocked by User:Essjay (supported by Mackensen) claiming personal attacks, insults, etc. where I, and others including other admins, believe none are. When I attempted to get clarity on the reasons for the block, and find out where policy allows such a block, I was stonewalled. I really just want to have an answer for the reasons for the block, which fall within policy and if they do not fall within policy, that issue dealt with. (read full description) -- Kickstart70-T-C 02:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Note for
coodinatorsteve, Due to personal bias and such i will not be able to consider this case.Benon 04:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Note for
bongo1234 (talk) on (NEW)
Brief: A link to an website critical of this company has been repeatedly removed, probably by members of the company itself. In the interests of the public, I think this link should not be removed. (read full description) -- Bongo1234 02:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Justforasecond (talk) on User_talk:Justforasecond Kwanzaa (open)
Brief: I was blocked for a month in what, as far as I can tell, was violation of wiki blocking policy. I would like to pursue arbitration against the blocking admin. Justforasecond 00:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC) (read full description)
- Accepted by Geo. 02:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Danbarnesdavies (talk) on many British royalty articles (pending)
Brief: I have recently been contributing a lot to the British royalty articles, and all of my edits have been reverted - primary discussion has not gone well (ref: User talk:Berks105#Royals_template; User talk:Danbarnesdavies#Reverts) (read full description) -- DBD 21:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Sholom (talk) on Thelma Drake (pending)
Brief: user insists on having his way, violations of 3RR (he was already locked out for a 3RR violation once, and has since done it again), refuses to talk, refused offer of mediation, using mulitple IP addresses (one at home and one from work, it seems). This is, admittedly, nowhere near as severe as other cases here listed, but seems to need mediation and/or arbitration nonetheless (read full description) -- Sholom 19:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Bakemono (talk) on Neurofunk (pending)
Brief: A malicious and extremely uncivil vandal, that's continually editing anonymously under a changing IP address (usually starting with 84.44.*.*), has been purposefully removing factually sound information from the listed Wiki-article. I've tried amicably engaging said user/IP address numerous times regarding the dispute, but to no avail -- the only responses I get are insults and excuses as to why they won't logically engage me on the issue at hand. This back-and-forth has gotten nowhere, instead becoming worse -- the user's only grown increasingly hostile (to the point of actual threats against me). Moreover, in an apparent attempt to 'get me back,' he also went and blatantly vandalized two articles I'd had previous involvement with: Cryptic Audio & Kouta Hirano. I ask you, please, for immediate involvement before this escalates any further. (read full description) -- Bakemono 14:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Fushidane (talk) on Kirby_(Nintendo) (pending)
Brief: This user called Kirbyfan103 has been vandalizing all pages related to Kirby_(Nintendo) and Kirby:_Right_Back_at_Ya! with useless, redundant and untrue information like putting even fanfics as facts like this page here Kirby_of_the_Stars:_Second_Generation. He also messing up some others as well. At this rate the pages will be filled with spam.... please stop him.. (read full description) -- Fushidane 08:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
WikiWoo (talk) on Roger Maloney (pending)
Brief: This page and others before it have been deleted. An individual and a group have been stalking my work in what appears as organized and directed vandalism attempting to get my goat. In reading some comments I caught that each left on others talk pages with comments like "he's back" and "we need to do this the hard way" suggests inaproprote motives. In a prior occasion my IP address was broad cast widely initiating personal attacks. This page in question was deleted without warning. Generally I can see games being played by one or more specific individuals (read full description) -- WikiWoo 13:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
HappyApple (talk) on Hwacha (pending)
Brief: I request assistance on Hwacha article (a historical weapon), because i believe some users are deleting substantial information that was written on the article in aims of "having their personal and own professionalism". Specifically User:Wikimachine states that Hwacha article version as of 25 June 2006 was too confusing because got Repetitive contents, i tried to get an agreement with him or her, but he or she didn't liked that, and started to delete information and revert and started to use offensive words like "don't write here.." "...I am frustrated, " GAME MANIACS GO AWAY" and so on. I think this is not civil and i wish someone can help me on this.(read full description) -- HappyApple 05:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
DPeterson (talk) (open)
'Brief:' Larry Sarner has been vandalizing my talk page by putting up false "vandalsim" notices. He is angry that I started a new Wiki article Advocates for Children in Therapy and is taking it out on me by vandalizing my talk page and harassing me. He was banned from the Barrett article and "soft-banned from the Bowlby article. He is not taking his fight to my talk page, the Advocates for Children in Therapy page. Please make him stop. DPeterson 23:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like it is being handled by Mangojuice. אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 23:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Ryorye (talk) on Chaguanas (open)
Brief: A user keeps on reverting my page even after I posted my side on the discussion page. I tried reasoning with him, I requested a RfC, a solution was given and he still chose to ignore the solution. I ask for help that my information may stay on the article. (read full description) -- Ryorye 22:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Accepted by David Mestel 05:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Cobaltbluetony (talk) on Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses (open)
Brief: User:Truthwanted continues to POV push a notion that Jehovah's Witnesses actually tried to curry favor with the Nazi government with their Declaration of Facts in 1933. Other editors besides myself seem to be unable to convince him to seriously address the style, tone, POV, or appropriateness of his proposal; what is more, it is contended that the edit itself will not survive a broader base of scrutiny. (read full description) -- CobaltBlueTony 18:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Accepted by Benon. אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 02:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)