This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kheider (talk | contribs) at 11:58, 17 May 2015 (Keep: WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids and commit needless genocide. The main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:58, 17 May 2015 by Kheider (talk | contribs) (Keep: WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids and commit needless genocide. The main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)1361 Leuschneria
- 1361 Leuschneria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DOesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America 23:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Unsure. The main subject of two old orbital studies , used as one of two examples in a paper about a method for calculating orbits , and mentioned more recently as a candidate for a certain orbital resonance (but found not to be in that resonance) . This last reference also cites a book chapter by Williams (1979) where its candidacy for the resonance was first proposed. Is it enough? —David Eppstein (talk) 07:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids and commit needless genocide. The main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected. -- Kheider (talk) 11:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)