This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Darkwind (talk | contribs) at 15:52, 12 June 2015 (→User-reported: edits are not vandalism (using responseHelper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:52, 12 June 2015 by Darkwind (talk | contribs) (→User-reported: edits are not vandalism (using responseHelper))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) "WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles and content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 19:08 on 25 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
Bot-reported
User-reported
- Washington Charter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 166.137.244.80 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 166.137.240.61 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (already blocked), 166.137.244.124 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), and 173.167.207.161 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) hopping IPs to add copyright violating images, self-promotion. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Declined. Your previous report of this user was already declined yesterday. Reposting it smacks of admin shopping, especially since the editor has not edited since the previous declined report. If you believe this user is misusing logged-out editing as a form of sockpuppetry, take it to WP:SPI; sockpuppetry is too complex of a situation to hand out blocks without discussion/evidence clearly logged. —Darkwind (talk) 15:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- OnceARed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On MDS (Martin Dawes Systems): account is being used only for promotional purposes. Repeated spamming with copyright material. Bazj (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot11 (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. The user's edits are not sufficiently promotional to be considered disruptive, and his attempts to create an article for a non-notable are similarly not disruptive enough to require a block. —Darkwind (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Soupy97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. this account deleted content from Priyanka Chopra and removed link from Suresh Raina also created two new pages on insignificant articles. Prymshbmg (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. I am also not convinced the edits are truly vandalism. — MusikAnimal 15:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Arif.hasam1408 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) vandalism. --Serols (talk) 15:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- 78.146.41.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) continuous vandalism and POV pushing by posting unreliable sources. Most likely a sockpuppet. PakSol 15:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)