Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jerm (talk | contribs) at 03:35, 3 July 2015 (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Jurassic World. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, DisuseKid, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Misplaced Pages
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!   Bfpage |leave a message  13:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

DisuseKid, you are invited on a Misplaced Pages Adventure!

Hi DisuseKid!! You're invited: learn how to edit Misplaced Pages in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Misplaced Pages Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Red links

Hi! I read the summary to your revert.

Please consider that red links are often a good thing. The purpose is to encourage article creation. We want people to write an article about the area library system. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Then someone needs to create an article of it first before it can be put in, otherwise it will never be done. DisuseKid (talk) 04:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

That's circular reasoning. There is a reason why red links exist. Red links say "an article doesn't exist here yet, but it should! Create me!" People can, and do, create articles when they're spurred on by red links. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:32, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of my edit on jurassic world

Excuse me but why did you just do that? Wkc19 :) (talk) 08:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Deletion on Charleston church shooting

I see you deleted my recent additions to the 'manifesto' section, which I inserted after the recommendations of an admin, MelanieN. Although it duplicates material on Dylann Roof, some users feel this context is necessary and we are trying to reach consensus. Would you care to weigh in on the Talk page? —Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 21:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Your recent editing history at Jurassic World shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JudeccaXIII (talk) 03:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)