This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JzG (talk | contribs) at 14:33, 27 August 2015 (→Collect: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:33, 27 August 2015 by JzG (talk | contribs) (→Collect: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Mark Regnerus Article
Hello I have made additional comment/suggestion on this article, could you please review and comment? Thanks... 24.92.249.215 (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
You reverted my edit without contributing to the talk page, then advise me to use the talk page. I already explained my view in the talk page so therefore you should go there and talk before reverting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cityside189 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right -- just ran out of time earlier. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Hi, I am the mediator for a case that you were listed in, please come to this page: Thanks The Editor of All Things Misplaced Pages 08:36, 8 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Editor of All Things Misplaced Pages (talk • contribs)
Susya delete
You deleted material from Susya while a discussion is taking place on the talk page. Please join it before you delete again. Settleman (talk) 06:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Shapps
The source very carefully avoids accusing Shapps of any wrongdoing ... which we ought well follow. The current use makes it quite appear that the living person operated an illegal pyramid scheme. Which is not claimed in the source given. No charges brought, and so no reason to maintain this bit in a BLP IMO. Collect (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Collect
Might be wise to back off Collect for a while, he's feeling persecuted and there are lots of eyes on him right now. Just my $0.02. Guy (Help!) 14:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)