This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WikiWikiWayne (talk | contribs) at 15:59, 15 February 2016 (→Need your help: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:59, 15 February 2016 by WikiWikiWayne (talk | contribs) (→Need your help: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hamid Dabashi
Reza Aslan
Hi Roscelese, The video I linked to, despite it's blunt title, seems to be very honest and well researched, giving very important information on Dr. Aslan. Please let me know why you don't think it is a valuable addition to the article.--Ortho (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
RedRabbitIdeas
Hi Roscelese, Thank you for taking the item to provide notes on my article Rabbit Message and my user name. I'm more than happy to make any changes you feel will improve them. I did want to note that the article is written in the same method as a few of the other related articles, so while I am confused by the deletion request, but I will gladly follow any advice on that. As for my user name, it's a user name I have used elsewhere and doesn't reflect my business name or Url, but I have already submitted a name change based on your advice.
Thank you and I hope I can meet the standards set for articles, which is my goal. I am new to this... so I'm still learning.
Thank you for patience and help regarding these concerns :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedRabbitIdeas (talk • contribs) 05:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I'll pick this one up. Might've ignored it, but the "doesn't reflect my business name" bit is almost insulting. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016 – Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (topic=ab) – abortion
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Need your help
Hi Roscelese. Since you are the top contributor to the Planned Parenthood article, I am here to ask for your help in figuring out which came first: The chicken or the egg. The Blog article was on January 27, 2015. Its version is slightly more complete than the Misplaced Pages version.
Earwig's copyright vio detector shows two possible copyright vios on the PP article, but one of them I can easily rule out because it attributes Misplaced Pages as its source.
Can you show me the Diff where the other one is not a copyright vio? A Diff that shows that the Misplaced Pages entry predates January 27, 2015? Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 15:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)