Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GoneAwayNowAndRetired (talk | contribs) at 23:07, 25 August 2006 (add note). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is currently under fairly severe Wikistress and is operating at a lower edit level than usual. Pending a possible ArbCom situation, I may be leaving Misplaced Pages in some or all form due to this.

• Archive 1

Connecticut‎;

Damnit, now I need to find someone else to watch Connecticut‎...Oh well, take your time, come back when you are ready. -Ravedave 21:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Wrongful insinuation

Retract the comment that I am a paid government webspammer.--MONGO 16:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Retract the comment that I am a "POV pushing 9/11 conspiracy theorist". Also, I never said webspammer or paid--where did you get THAT from...? Misinterpretation/rewording of what I wrote. My edit history on these articles (and comments from most people) bear out my fight to NPOV only them. rootology (T) 16:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Where would one get the idea that I am a government POV pusher? You never edited any of these types of articles until after the ED deletion and other areas...now you're all over them, the same articles I have worked on for some time...that definitely appears to be wikistalking and my guess is that information about me being a government POV pusher could only come from nonsense you read at encyclopedia dramatica...an artcle that you fought hard to keep here at Misplaced Pages...I don't know who you think you're fooling, but it's not me.--MONGO 17:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

1) I only began really editing Misplaced Pages a short bit before I found that mess (look at my contribs). 2) I got pulled into that mess somehow, and you've held it against me since for trying to be a logical voice of neutral reason in it. 3) I'll edit anything I want, thanks, or that interests me, and this has NOTHING to do with you. 4) I really have no idea what you're going on about anymore. 5) If you don't STOP IMMEDIATELY with attacking me and accusing me of stalking you, I will take this as a harassment issue and will insist you file ArbCom. You have NOT ONCE providing any requested evidence of this, no matter where I ask you to. Why are you unwilling to show me what you think it is I'm doing wrong? If you won't take this higher and through the proper channels, I will, and I will get your harassment of me stopped. Why won't you let me just build this encyclopedia in peace? rootology (T) 17:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

You state I am a government POV pusher as linked above, you show up at articles I have edited for a long time, and this is after the ED nonsense.--MONGO 17:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I found those articles from reading Morton's user page, after he left me comments. Misplaced Pages is hardly a big place, for "social circles", and I read these articles and saw elements that seemed to be not meeting NPOV, so I began making some edits to them to bring them more in line with policy. My first edit to one of them. I NPOV'd a section name. Then I added constructive info here to expand the encyclopedia. I added a missing reference section. I added missing info with full sourcing to expand and clarify the encyclopedia. I explained my additions. Added more sources. Did clean up. Explained what I was doing. Looking through the vast bulk of my contribs there, that's all I've done. You've been on WP what, like three years? You have how many tens of thousands of edits and how many articles on your watchlist probably? Of course we're going to see each other on our mutual watchlists, especially as some of our interests apparently DO overlap. How is that wikistalking? Again, look at WHEN the bulk of my contribs really begin, when I really began digging into being an editor--around the end of June 2006. Is it unreasonable that the scope of what I edit should expand? Based on WP:STALK if anything you're the one coming after ME, questioning all my good faith edits. Again, either file ArbCom, leave me alone to build the encyclopedia/clean it up in the NPOV fashion that interests me the most, or if you don't leave me alone immediately I will begin assembling all this evidence to properly file an ArbCom against you to get your actions toward me reviewed. rootology (T) 17:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Please trim your statement on Requests for arbitration

Thank you for making a statement in an Arbitration application on Requests for arbitration. We ask all participants and commentators to limit the size of their initial statements to 500 words. Please trim your statement. If the case is accepted, you will have the opportunity to present more evidence. Neat, concisely presented statements are much more likely to be understood and to influence the decisions of the arbitrators.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 22:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

MONGO

Even if you hadn't discussed anything with him before, once you started clashing, you continued it. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 21st

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)