Misplaced Pages

talk:Two versions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) at 16:00, 10 November 2004 (Doesn't work well with ongoing edits to either version). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:00, 10 November 2004 by Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) (Doesn't work well with ongoing edits to either version)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Oppose. Misplaced Pages should not have warring versions of articles. RickK 21:14, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC)

But it does. The hope is to make it more peaceable. VV 21:44, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
This looks a hell of a lot better than this. VV 21:46, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

reversion/non-reversion wars can be handled more simply

Perhaps instead of two versions, the reversion/non-reversion wars can be temporarily handled by having the proposed reversion present but highlighted in red, with a notice in red to note that the text is being disputed by proposing reversion and not by proposing balancing text.--Silverback 03:54, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I thought this might work, but as a reverted page may also be subsequently edited the coding will not go back to the previous version which may lie back in history. Fred Bauder 16:00, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)